A modular metagenomics analysis system for integrated multi-step data exploration
Mak, L.; Tierney, B.; Ronkowski, C.; Toomey, M.; Martinez, J. S. A.; Zimmerman, S.; Fu, C.; Kopbayeva, M.; Noyvert, A.; Farthing, B.; Tang, S.; Mason, C.; Hajirasouliha, I.
Show abstract
MotivationComputational analysis of large-scale metagenomics sequencing datasets have proven to be both incredibly valuable for extracting isolate-level taxonomic, and functional insights from complex microbial communities. However, due to an ever-expanding ecosystem of metagenomics-specific methods and file-formats, designing seamless and scalable end-to-end workflows, and exploring the massive amounts of output data have become studies unto themselves. One-click bioinformatics pipelines have helped to organize these tools into targeted workflows, but they suffer from general compatibility and maintainability issues, and preclude replication. MethodsTo address the gap in easily extensible yet robustly distributable metagenomics workflows, we have developed a module-based metagenomics analysis system "Core Analysis Modular Pipeline" (CAMP), written in Snakemake, a popular workflow management system, along with a standardized module and working directory architecture. Each module can be run independently or conjointly with a series of others to produce the target data format (e.g. short-read preprocessing alone, or short-read preprocessing followed by de novo assembly), and outputs aggregated summary statistics reports and semi-guided Jupyter notebook-based visualizations. ResultsWe have applied CAMP to a set of ten metagenomics samples to demonstrate how a modular analysis system with built-in data visualization at intermediate steps facilitates rich and seamless inter-communication between output data from different analytic purposes. AvailabilityThe CAMP ecosystem (module template and analysis modules) can be found https://github.com/Meta-CAMP.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.