A PCR-RFLP method for the detection of CRISPR-induced indels
Angelopoulou, L.; Stylianopoulou, E.; Tegopoulos, K.; Farmakioti, I.; Grigoriou, M. E.; Skavdis, G.
Show abstract
CRISPR-based technologies have revolutionised genome editing and are widely used for knocking out genes in cell lines and organisms. From a practical perspective, a critical factor that largely influences the successful outcome of CRISPR gene knockout experiments is the reliable and fast identification of fully mutated cells carrying exclusively null alleles of the target gene. Here we describe a novel strategy based on the well-documented reliability and simplicity of the classical PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), which allows the assessment of the editing efficiency in pools of edited cells and the effective identification of cell clones that carry exclusively mutated alleles. This fast and cost-effective method, named PIM-RFLP (PCR Induced Mutagenesis-RFLP), is executed in two steps. In the first step, the editing target is amplified by a set of mutagenic primers that create a restriction enzyme degenerate cleavage site in the amplification product of the wild type allele. As a proof of principle, we chose the XcmI restriction site because it is especially suitable since it has the particularity of containing nine centrally placed non-specific nucleotides. This gives great flexibility in the mutagenic primers design and allows for efficient execution of the mutagenic PCR. In the second step, the evaluation of the editing efficiency in pools of edited cells or the identification of fully mutated single-cell derived clones is achieved following the standard procedure for any PCR-RFLP assay: digestion of the PCR products and analysis of the restriction fragments in an agarose gel. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/535589v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@131eda6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e93c43org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@736fe5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b750c1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential efficacies of Cas nucleases on microsatellites involved in human disorders and associated off-target mutations 95%
- SIBR-Cas enables host-independent and universal CRISPR genome engineering in bacteria 94%
- SLALOM: A Simple and Rapid Method for Enzymatic Synthesis of CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNA Libraries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Efficient Vector-based CRISPR/Cas9 System in an Oreochromis mossambicus Cell Line using Endogenous Promoters 95%
- A pair of primers facing at the double-strand break site enables to detect NHEJ-mediated indel mutations at a 1-bp resolution 93%
- MutliFRAGing: Rapid and Simultaneous Genotyping of Multiple Alleles in a Single Reaction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of Streptococcus uberis Cas9 (SuCas9) - a Type II-A Ortholog Functional in Human Cells 94%
- Self-cutting and integrating CRISPR plasmids (SCIPs) enable targeted genomic integration of large genetic payloads for rapid cell engineering 93%
- Towards CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ares-GT: design of guide RNAs targeting multiple genes for CRISPR-Cas experiments 92%
- Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: comparison with 20X WGS in layers 92%
- GreenGate 2.0: backwards compatible addons for assembly of complex transcriptional units and their stacking with GreenGate 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR/Cas9-based repeat depletion for the high-throughput genotyping of complex plant genomes 93%
- Evaluation of N6-adenine DNA-immunoprecipitation-based genomic profiling in eukaryotes 91%
- Mutational scanning of CRX classifies clinical variants and reveals biochemical properties of the transcriptional effector domain 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.