Back

Microtubule search-and-capture model evaluates the effect of chromosomal volume conservation on spindle assembly during mitosis

Nayak, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Paul, R.

2023-04-08 biophysics
10.1101/2023.04.08.536118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Variation in the chromosome numbers can arise from the erroneous mitosis or fusion and fission of chromosomes. While the mitotic errors lead to an increase or decrease in the overall chromosomal substance in the daughter cells, fission and fusion keep this conserved. Variations in chromosome numbers are assumed to be a crucial driver of speciation. For example, the members of the muntjac species are known to have very different karyotypes with the chromosome numbers varying from 2n = 70 + 3B in the brown brocket deer to 2n = 46 in the Chinese muntjac and 2n = 6/7 in the Indian muntjac. The chromosomal content in the nucleus of these closely related mammals is roughly the same and various chromosome fusion and fission pathways have been suggested as the evolution process of these karyotypes. Similar trends can also be found in lepidoptera and yeast species which show a wide variation of chromosome numbers. The effect of chromosome number variation on the spindle assembly time and accuracy is still not properly addressed. We computationally investigate the effect of conservation of the total chromosomal substance on the spindle assembly during prometaphase. Our results suggest that chromosomal fusion pathways aid the microtubule-driven Search and Capture of the kinetochore in cells with monocentric chromosomes. We further report a comparative analysis of the site and percentage of amphitelic captures, dependence on cell shape, position of the kinetochore in respect of chromosomal volume partitioning.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.0%
2
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.8%
3
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
New Journal of Physics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Cytoskeleton
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.9%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
11
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
The European Physical Journal E
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
24
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%