Back

Machine learning from the CARDAMON trial identifies a carfilzomib-specific mutational response signature

Walker, I. G.; D'Arcy, V.; Khandelwal, G. K.; Anderson, G.; Aubareda, A.; Wilson, W.; Fitzsimons, E.; Galas-Filipowicz, D.; Foster, K.; Popat, R. P.; Ramasamy, K.; Streetly, M.; Bygrave, C.; Benjamin, R.; de Tute, R. M.; Camilleri, M.; Chavda, S. J.; Pang, G.; Dadaga, T.; Kamora, S.; Cavenagh, J.; Phillips, E. H.; Clifton-Hadley, L.; Owen, R. G.; Herrero, J. H.; Yong, K.; Chapman, M. A.

2023-04-09 hematology
10.1101/2023.04.08.23288287 medRxiv
Show abstract

Precision medicine holds great promise to improve outcomes in cancer, including haematological malignancies. However, there are few biomarkers that influence choice of chemotherapy in clinical practice. In particular, multiple myeloma requires an individualized approach as there exist several active therapies, but little agreement on how and when they should be used and combined. We have previously shown that a transcriptomic signature can identify specific bortezomib- and lenalidomide-sensitivity. However, gene expression signatures are challenging to implement clinically. We reasoned that signatures based on the presence or absence of gene mutations would be more tractable in the clinical setting, though examples of such signatures are rare. We performed whole exome sequencing as part of the CARDAMON trial, which employed carfilzomib-based therapy. We applied advanced machine learning approaches to discover mutational patterns predictive of treatment outcome. The resulting model accurately predicted progression-free survival (PFS) both in CARDAMON patients and in an external validation set of patients from the CoMMpass study who had received carfilzomib. The signature was specific for carfilzomib therapy and was strongly driven by genes on chromosome 1p36. Importantly, patients predicted to be carfilzomib-sensitive had a longer PFS when treated with carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone than with bortezomib/carfilzomib/dexamethasone. However, in those predicted to be carfilzomib-insensitive, the latter therapy may have been capable of eradicating carfilzomib-resistant clones. We propose that the signature can be used to make rational therapeutic decisions and could be incorporated into future clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
8
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
18
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%