Back

Quantification of amyloid protein enrichment by mass spectrometry improves amyloidosis typing

Di Tommaso, S.; Chauveau, B.; Dourthe, C.; Dupuy, J.-W.; SALTEL, F.; Le Bail, B.; Raymond, A.-A.

2023-04-11 pathology
10.1101/2023.04.07.23285834 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAmyloidosis typing is crucial to determine the best therapeutic strategy for patients. Since conventional histological techniques often fail, the identification of amyloid precursors by mass spectrometry became the new standard. However, without quantification, selecting the amyloid precursor from proteins that may be ubiquitous under non-pathological conditions may be equivocal. Therefore, we quantified protein enrichment in amyloid deposits to improve typing. MethodsProtein enrichment was measured by extracted ion chromatogram based label free quantification by comparing a microdissected amyloid area with a non-amyloid area. We assessed the discrimination ability of candidate precursors with this approach compared to the two practiced identification methods. ResultsAs proof of concept, we selected seven cases, 5 typical of the most common amyloidosis subtypes and typed by immunostainings, 2 inconclusive after immunohistochemistry. Proteins associated with amyloid deposits were identified in all samples confirming the pathology. When the routine clinical mass spectrometric identification techniques allowed unambiguous conclusions for 2/3 of 7 cases, quantification of the enrichment ratio in the amyloid deposit allowed unambiguous precursor selection in all cases. ConclusionQuantification of precursor enrichment in amyloid deposits is a promising optimization for amyloidosis typing. Incorporated into routine clinical processes, it will improve patient care in difficult diagnostic situations.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.