Shifts in the coral microbiome in response to in situ experimental deoxygenation
Howard, R. D.; Schul, M.; Rodriguez Bravo, L. M.; Altieri, A.; Meyer, J. L.
Show abstract
Global climate change impacts ocean communities through rising surface temperatures, ocean acidification, and deoxygenation. While the response of the coral holobiont to the first two effects has been relatively well studied, little is known about the response of the coral microbiome to deoxygenation. In this study, we investigated the response of the microbiome to hypoxia in two coral species that differ in their relative tolerance to hypoxia. We conducted in situ oxygen manipulations on a coral reef in Bahia Almirante, Panama, which has previously experienced episodes of low dissolved oxygen concentrations. Naive coral colonies (previously unexposed to hypoxia) of massive starlet coral (Siderastrea siderea) and Lamarcks sheet coral (Agaricia lamarcki) were transplanted to a reef and either enclosed in chambers that created hypoxic conditions or left at ambient oxygen levels. We collected samples of surface mucus and tissue after 48 hours of exposure and characterized the microbiome by sequencing 16S rRNA genes. We found that the microbiomes of the two coral species were distinct from one another and remained so after exhibiting similar shifts in microbiome composition in response to hypoxia. There was an increase in both abundance and number of taxa of anaerobic microbes after exposure to hypoxia. Some of these taxa may play beneficial roles in the coral holobiont by detoxifying the surrounding environment during hypoxic stress. This work describes the first characterization of the coral microbiome under hypoxia and is an initial step toward identifying potential beneficial bacteria for corals facing this environmental stressor. ImportanceMarine hypoxia is a threat for corals but has remained understudied in tropical regions where coral reefs are abundant. Deoxygenation on coral reefs will worsen with ongoing climate change, acidification, and eutrophication. We do not yet understand the response of the coral microbiome to hypoxia, and whether this reaction may have a beneficial or harmful role in the coral holobiont. To understand how the coral microbial community structure responds during hypoxic stress, we experimentally lowered the oxygen levels around corals in the field to observe changes in the composition of the coral microbiome. We documented the increase of anaerobic and pathogenic bacteria in the microbiomes of the massive starlet coral (Siderastrea siderea) and Lamarcks sheet coral (Agaricia lamarcki) in 48 hours. This work provides fundamental knowledge of the microbial response in the coral holobiont during hypoxia and may provide insight to holobiont function during stress.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiome depletion and recovery in the sea anemone, Exaiptasia diaphana, following antibiotic exposure 96%
- Functional potential and evolutionary response to long-term heat selection of bacterial associates of coral photosymbionts 95%
- Impact of host species on assembly, composition, and functional profiles of phycosphere microbiomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiome signatures in Acropora cervicornis are associated with genotypic resistance to elevated nutrients and heat stress 93%
- Host-specific epibiomes of distinct Acropora cervicornis genotypes persist after field transplantation 93%
- Shifts in marine invertebrate bacterial assemblages associated with tissue necrosis during a heatwave 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergent community assembly among globally separated acidic cave biofilms 95%
- Testing the priming effect in the deep ocean: are microbes too starved to consume recalcitrant organic carbon? 95%
- Microbial ecology of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, hatcheries: impacts of the built environment on fish mucosal microbiota 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.