Embryo-specific epigenetic mechanisms reconstitute the CHH methylation landscape during Arabidopsis embryogenesis
Hsieh, P.-H.; Frost, J. M.; Choi, Y.; Hsieh, T.-F.; Zilberman, D.; Fischer, R. L.
Show abstract
The modification of flowering plant DNA by CHH methylation acts primarily to silence transposable elements, of which many active copies are present in Arabidopsis thaliana. During embryogenesis, the CHH methylation landscape is dramatically reprogrammed, resulting in exceedingly high levels of this modification upon mature embryo formation. The mechanisms constituting the remodeling process, and its function in embryos, are unclear. Here, we isolate embryos from Arabidopsis plants harboring mutations for key components of the pathways that confer CHH methylation, namely RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) and the Chromomethylase 2 (CMT2) pathways. We reveal that embryos are more methylated than leaves at shared CMT2 and RdDM targeting loci, accounting for most embryonic CHH hypermethylation. While the majority of embryo CHH methylated loci overlap with those in somatic tissues, a subset of conventional pericentric CMT2-methylated loci are instead targeted by RdDM in embryos. These loci, termed embRdDM exhibit intermediate H3K9me2 levels, associated with increased chromatin accessibility. Strikingly, more than 50% of the embRdDM loci in pollen vegetative (nurse) cells and ddm1 mutant somatic tissues are also targeted by RdDM, and these tissues were also reported to exhibit increased chromatin accessibility in pericentric heterochromatin. Furthermore, the root columella stem cell niche also displays CHH hypermethylation and an enriched presence of small RNAs at embRdDM loci. Finally, we observe a significant overlap of CHH hypermethylated loci with endosperm DEMETER targeting sites, suggesting that non-cell autonomous communication within the seed may contribute to the epigenetic landscape of the embryo. However, similar overlap with vegetative cell DEMETER targets indicates that the chromatin landscape that allows DEMETER access is mirrored in developing embryos, permitting CHH methylation catalysis at the same loci. Our findings demonstrate that both conserved and embryo-specific epigenetic mechanisms reshape CHH methylation profiles in the dynamic chromatin environment of embryogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Atypical epigenetic and small RNA control of degenerated transposons and their fragments in clonally reproducing Spirodela polyrhiza 97%
- Plant Polymerase IV sensitizes chromatin through histone modifications to preclude spread of silencing into protein-coding domains 97%
- Reprogramming of 24nt siRNAs in rice gametes 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic conflict on a degenerating Y chromosome increases mutational burden in Drosophila males 95%
- A hierarchical transcriptional network activates specific CDK inhibitors that regulate G2 to control cell size and number in Arabidopsis 94%
- Binding of guide piRNA triggers methylation of the unstructured N-terminal region of Aub leading to assembly of the piRNA amplification complex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conditional GWAS of non-CG transposon methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals major polymorphisms in five genes 96%
- VAL genes regulate vegetative phase change via miR156-dependent and independent mechanisms 95%
- Photodamage repair pathways contribute to the accurate maintenance of the DNA methylome landscape upon UV exposure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ovule siRNAs methylate protein-coding genes in trans 97%
- The maize gene maternal derepression of r1 (mdr1) encodes a DNA glycosylase that demethylates DNA and reduces siRNA expression in endosperm 96%
- Systematic histone H4 replacement in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a role for H4R17 in regulating flowering time 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.