Back

Cell surface proteomics reveal a strategy for targeting myeloma through combinatorial targeting of TNFRSF8 and TMPRSS11E

Anderson, G. S.; Walker, I. G.; Roy, J. P.; Chapman, M. A.

2023-04-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.04.04.535580 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective novel treatment in haematological malignancies that has shown promise as a therapeutic option in multiple myeloma. However, widespread adoption of CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma has been hindered by the challenge of unbiased target antigen identification and selection. As activation of CAR T-cells requires minimal antigen on the cell surface, a major risk of toxicity is destruction of healthy tissue expressing the target protein, i.e. on-target, off-tumour toxicity. Indeed, examination of the myeloma surface proteome demonstrated that there was no single target that was completely unique to myeloma cells. One approach to achieve target specificity is to require simultaneous expression of two proteins on the target cells, so-called AND-gate targeting. To identify potential AND-gate combinations for myeloma, we devised an algorithm to prioritise pairings that exhibited pan-myeloma expression and no overlapping expression in vital healthy tissue, as predicted by proteomics. Through this approach, we identified over 600 combinations. To minimise the risk of exhaustion or priming by CAR T-cells, any combination whereby one of the two antigens was expressed in T-cells was also excluded, leading to the prioritisation of 144 candidate pairings. This demonstrates the potential for AND-gating to expand the repertoire of CAR T-cell targets for myeloma. We evaluated one of these candidate pairings, TMPRSS11E and TNFRSF8, in vitro. Activation in the Jurkat cell line co-expressing a suboptimal CAR against TNFRSF8 and a chimeric costimulatory receptor (CCR) against TMPRSS11E was markedly enhanced following co-culture with a dual-target positive myeloma cell line compared with single-target positive K562, demonstrating improved discrimination between tumour and non-tumour cells.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.