Cell surface proteomics reveal a strategy for targeting myeloma through combinatorial targeting of TNFRSF8 and TMPRSS11E
Anderson, G. S.; Walker, I. G.; Roy, J. P.; Chapman, M. A.
Show abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective novel treatment in haematological malignancies that has shown promise as a therapeutic option in multiple myeloma. However, widespread adoption of CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma has been hindered by the challenge of unbiased target antigen identification and selection. As activation of CAR T-cells requires minimal antigen on the cell surface, a major risk of toxicity is destruction of healthy tissue expressing the target protein, i.e. on-target, off-tumour toxicity. Indeed, examination of the myeloma surface proteome demonstrated that there was no single target that was completely unique to myeloma cells. One approach to achieve target specificity is to require simultaneous expression of two proteins on the target cells, so-called AND-gate targeting. To identify potential AND-gate combinations for myeloma, we devised an algorithm to prioritise pairings that exhibited pan-myeloma expression and no overlapping expression in vital healthy tissue, as predicted by proteomics. Through this approach, we identified over 600 combinations. To minimise the risk of exhaustion or priming by CAR T-cells, any combination whereby one of the two antigens was expressed in T-cells was also excluded, leading to the prioritisation of 144 candidate pairings. This demonstrates the potential for AND-gating to expand the repertoire of CAR T-cell targets for myeloma. We evaluated one of these candidate pairings, TMPRSS11E and TNFRSF8, in vitro. Activation in the Jurkat cell line co-expressing a suboptimal CAR against TNFRSF8 and a chimeric costimulatory receptor (CCR) against TMPRSS11E was markedly enhanced following co-culture with a dual-target positive myeloma cell line compared with single-target positive K562, demonstrating improved discrimination between tumour and non-tumour cells.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Simplified Function-First Method for the Discovery and Optimization of Bispecific Immune Engaging Antibodies 93%
- Targeting prostate cancer by new bispecific monocyte engager directed to prostate-specific membrane antigen 93%
- A mechanistically novel peptide agonist of the IL-7 receptor that addresses limitations of IL-7 cytokine therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of tumor antigen-specific antibody responses in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide and pembrolizumab 94%
- Domain Binding and Isotype Dictate the Activity of Anti-human OX40 Antibodies 93%
- HERV-derived epitopes represent new targets for T-cell based immunotherapies in ovarian cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 93%
- Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First-Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
- Identification of atypical circulating tumor cells with prognostic value in metastatic breast cancer patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CAR-T Engager Proteins Optimize Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapies for Lymphoma 93%
- CD20 expression regulates CD37 levels in B-cell lymphoma: implications for immunotherapies. 93%
- Patient-derived tumor explant models of tumor immune microenvironment reveal distinct and reproducible immunotherapy responses 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tissue and Peripheral T-cell Repertoire Predicts Immunotherapy Response and Progression-Free Survival in NSCLC Patients 92%
- Interferon-γ Increases Sensitivity to Chemotherapy and Provides Immunotherapy Targets in Models of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer 91%
- GRP78 promotes stemness in normal and neoplastic cells 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.