Deep Learning Evaluation of Echocardiograms to Identify Occult Atrial Fibrillation
Stein, N. R.; Duffy, G.; Sandhu, R. K.; Chugh, S. S.; Albert, C. M.; Cheng, S.; Ouyang, D.; Yuan, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) can often be missed by intermittent screening given its frequently paroxysmal and asymptomatic presentation. Deep learning algorithms have been developed to identify patients with paroxysmal AF from electrocardiograms (ECGs) in sinus rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) may provide additional structural information complementary to ECGs that could also be used to help identify occult AF. ObjectiveWe sought to determine whether deep learning evaluation of echocardiograms of patients in sinus rhythm could identify occult AF. MethodsWe identified patients who had TTEs performed between 2004 and 2021. We created a two-stage model that (1) distinguished which TTEs were in sinus rhythm and which were in AF and then (2) predicted which of the TTEs in sinus rhythm were in patients with paroxysmal AF. Models were trained from video-based convolutional neural networks using TTE parasternal long axis (PLAX) videos. The AF prediction performance was compared to prediction using clinical variables, CHADSVASc score, and left atrial (LA) size. ResultsOur model trained on 111,319 TTE videos distinguished TTEs in AF from those in sinus rhythm with high accuracy (AUC 0.96, 0.95-0.96). A total of 72,181 TTE videos were in sinus rhythm. When tested on a held-out sample, the model predicted the occurrence of concurrent AF with an AUC of 0.71 (0.69-0.73). Using the max F1 threshold, the PPV was 0.20 and the NPV was 0.95. The model performed better than predicting concurrent AF using clinical risk factors (AUC 0.67, 0.65-0.69), LA area (AUC 0.63, 0.62-0.64), and CHADSVASc (AUC 0.61, 0.60-0.62). ConclusionA deep learning model distinguished AF from sinus rhythm TTEs with high accuracy and predicted the presence of AF within 90 days of sinus rhythm TTEs moderately well, better than clinical variables or LA size alone. TTEs may help inform automated opportunistic AF screening efforts.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 95%
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 94%
- Heart failure, female sex and atrial fibrillation are the main drivers of human atrial cardiomyopathy: results from the CATCH ME consortium 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 96%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 93%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes: The Impact Of Functional Mapping In Chagas Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Vascular Endothelial Barrier Protection Prevents Atrial Fibrillation by Preserving Cardiac Nanostructure 93%
- Pathogenic HFE Variants and Evaluation for Hemochromatosis in Patients with Early-onset Atrial Fibrillation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 94%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 94%
- A comprehensive stroke risk assessment by combining atrial computational fluid dynamics simulations and functional patient data 93%
- Explaining Deep Neural Networks for Knowledge Discovery in Electrocardiogram Analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.