Risk of Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Associated with COVID-19 Variants of Concern: A Sequential Prospective Meta-Analysis
Farooq, F.; Oakley, E. M.; Kerchner, D.; Kim, J. Y. H.; Akelo, V.; Tippett Barr, B. A.; Bevilacqua, E.; Bracero, N.; del Mar Gil, M.; Delgado-Lopez, C.; Favre, G.; Fernandez Buhigas, I.; Leung, H. Y. H.; Laurita Longo, V.; Panchaud, A.; Poon, L. C.; Martinez-Portilla, R. J.; Valencia-Prado, M.; Tielsch, J. M.; Smith, E. R.; The COVI-PREG International Registry, ; The PMA collaborators,
Show abstract
IntroductionThe main objective of this study is to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis with collaborators from various countries to identify SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. MethodsEligible studies included registries and single- or multi-site cohort studies that recruited pregnant and recently postpartum women with confirmed COVID-19. Studies must have enrolled at least 25 women within a defined catchment area. Studies also had to have data that overlapped more than a single COVID-19 variant time period. We invited principal investigators already participating in an ongoing sequential, prospective meta-analysis of perinatal COVID-19. Investigators shared individual patient data (IPD) with the technical team for review and analysis. We examined 31 outcomes related to: i) COVID-19 severity (n=5); ii) maternal morbidities including adverse birth outcomes (n=14); iii) fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality (n=5) and iv) adverse birth outcomes (n=8). SARS-CoV-2 strains that have been identified as variants of concern (VOC) by the WHO were analyzed using the publicly available strain frequency data by Nextstrain.org and strains were classified as dominant when they were more than half of sequences in a given geographic area. We applied a 2-stage IPD meta-analytic framework to generate pooled relative risks, with 95% CI for each dominant variant and outcome pair when there were one or more studies with available data. ResultsOur data show that the Delta wave, compared to Omicron, was associated with a higher risk of all adverse COVID-19 severity outcomes in pregnancy including risk of hospitalization [RR 4.02 (95% CI 1.10, 14.69), n=1 study], risk of ICU admissions [RR 2.59 (95% CI 1.26, 5.30, n=3 studies], risk of critical care admission [RR 2.52 (95% CI 1.25, 5.08, n=3 studies], risk of needing ventilation [RR 3.96 (95% CI 1.47, 10.71), n=3 studies] and risk of pneumonia [RR 6.73 (95% CI 2.17, 20.90), n=3 studies]. The majority of maternal morbidity and mortality indicators were not at increased risk during any of the COVID-19 variant waves except hemorrhage, any Cesarean section, intrapartum Cesarean section and maternal composite outcome, although data was limited. Risk of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality did not show significant increases in risks during any of the COVID-19 waves except stillbirth and perinatal death during the Delta wave ([RR 4.84 (95% CI 1.37, 17.05, n=3 studies], [RR 6.03 (95%CI 1.63, 22.34), n=3 studies], respectively) when compared to the Pre-alpha wave. Adverse birth outcomes including very low birthweight and very preterm birth also showed increased risks during the Delta wave compared to the Pre-alpha wave. DiscussionDuring periods of Delta strain predominance, all COVID-19 severity outcomes were more severe among pregnant women, compared to periods when other COVID-19 strains predominated. In addition, there are limited data comparing the impact of different variants on pregnancy outcomes. This highlights the importance of ongoing genomic surveillance among special populations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 94%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 92%
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Group B streptococcal infections in newborn infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing various strategies 93%
- Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis 93%
- Which children and young people are at higher risk of severe disease and death after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods 96%
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 95%
- Effect of caesarean birth on perinatal mortality for singleton breech presentation in spontaneous preterm labour – a target trial emulation using Scottish health record data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.