Back

The small mycobacterial ribosomal protein, bS22, modulates aminoglycoside accessibility to its 16S rRNA helix-44 binding site

Majumdar, S.; Deep, A.; Sharma, M. R.; Canestrari, J.; Stone, M.; Smith, C.; Koripella, R. K.; Keshavan, P.; Banavali, N. K.; Wade, J.; Gray, T. A.; Derbyshire, K. M.; Agrawal, R. K.

2023-04-01 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.03.31.535098 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Treatment of tuberculosis continues to be challenging due to the widespread latent form of the disease and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of the pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bacterial ribosomes are a common and effective target for antibiotics. Several second line anti-tuberculosis drugs, e.g. kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin, target ribosomal RNA to inhibit protein synthesis. However, M. tuberculosis can acquire resistance to these drugs, emphasizing the need to identify new drug targets. Previous cryo-EM structures of the M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis ribosomes identified two novel ribosomal proteins, bS22 and bL37, in the vicinity of two crucial drug-binding sites: the mRNA-decoding center on the small (30S), and the peptidyl-transferase center on the large (50S) ribosomal subunits, respectively. The functional significance of these two small proteins is unknown. In this study, we observe that an M. smegmatis strain lacking the bs22 gene shows enhanced susceptibility to kanamycin compared to the wild-type strain. Cryo-EM structures of the ribosomes lacking bS22 in the presence and absence of kanamycin suggest a direct role of bS22 in modulating the 16S rRNA kanamycin-binding site. Our structures suggest that amino-acid residue Lys-16 of bS22 interacts directly with the phosphate backbone of helix 44 of 16S rRNA to influence the micro-configuration of the kanamycin-binding pocket. Our analysis shows that similar interactions occur between eukaryotic homologues of bS22, and their corresponding rRNAs, pointing to a common mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance in higher organisms.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.