Back

Disparities in Mortality Associated with Acute Myocardial Infarction and COVID-19 in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis

Muhyieddeen, A. H.; Cheng, S.; Mamas, M. A.; Beasley, D. L.; Cook-Wiens, G.; Gulati, M.

2023-03-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.30.23287987 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management and outcomes is unclear. We examined AMI patient management and outcomes during the pandemics initial nine months, comparing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases. MethodsWe identified all patients hospitalized for AMI in 2020 using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), identifying those with or without concurrent COVID-19. Logistic and linear regression was used for analyses of associations, with adjustment for potential confounders. ResultsPatients with both AMI and COVID-19 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (aOR 3.19, 95% CI 2.63-3.88), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.54-2.33), and hemodialysis (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05-1.89) compared to those without COVID-19. Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher in-hospital mortality than White patients, (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.35-3.59) and (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 1.5-8.37). Moreover, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher odds of initiating hemodialysis, (aOR 5.48, 95% CI 2.13-14.1), (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.13-7.97), and (aOR 7.84, 95% CI 1.55-39.5) and were less likely to receive PCI for AMI, (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.74), (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.86), and (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90). Additionally, Black patients had a lower likelihood of undergoing CABG surgery for AMI (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49-0.61). ConclusionOur study revealed increased mortality and complications in COVID-19 patients with AMI, highlighting significant racial disparities. Urgent measures addressing healthcare disparities, such as enhancing access and promoting culturally sensitive care, are needed to improve health equity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.