Back

Utility of a new lower limb and trunk functional evaluation for pitchers with focus on the physical characteristics of players with a throwing disorder

Matsui, T.; Azuma, Y.; Hiramoto, M.; Seo, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Matsuzawa, K.; Kida, N.; Morihara, T.

2023-04-03 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy Community evaluation
10.1101/2023.03.30.23287922 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesA pitching motion involves three-dimensional whole body movement. Proper pelvic and trunk rotation movement are important for the prevention of throwing injuries. Given that throwing is not a simple rotation movement, the evaluation of proper motion should reflect muscle strength as well as coordination and pitching motion characteristics. We have devised a throwing rotational assessment (TRA) as a new evaluation of the total rotation angle required for throwing. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of players with throwing disorders compared to a pain-free group using TRA. Materials and methodsThe subjects consisted of 164 high school baseball pitchers who participated in a medical check. Pain-induced tests included an elbow hyperextension test and an intra-articular shoulder impingement test. Pitchers who felt pain in either test were classified into a disorder group (n=61). With the subjects in a position similar to the foot contact phase of throwing, the rotation angles of the pelvis and trunk were measured. All tests were performed in the throwing and opposite directions. ResultsThe disorder group had significantly lower average rotation angles of the pelvis and trunk in the throwing direction and the rotation angle of the trunk in the opposite direction compared to the healthy group. ConclusionTRA reflects the complex whole body rotation movement. Reductions in rotational angles as assessed in TRA may be associated with throwing disorders. TRA is a simple method that may be useful in the early detection of a throwing disorder and could be used in the systematic evaluation during a medical check, as well as during self-check in the sports field.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
35.5%
2
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
9
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%