Back

An easy-to-use microfluidic mechano-chemostat for tissues and organisms reveals that confined growth is accompanied with increased macromolecular crowding

Ben Meriem, Z.; Mateo, T.; Faccini, J.; Denais, C.; Dufour-Castan, R.; Guynet, C.; Merle, T.; Suzanne, M.; Di-Luoffo, M.; Guillermet-Guibert, J.; Alric, B.; Landiech, S.; Malaquin, L.; Mesnilgrente, F.; Laborde, A.; Mazenq, L.; Courson, R.; Delarue, M.

2023-03-30 biophysics
10.1101/2023.03.29.534752 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conventional culture conditions are oftentimes insufficient to study tissues, organisms, or 3D multicellular assemblies. They lack both dynamic chemical and mechanical control over the microenvironment. While specific microfluidic devices have been developed to address chemical control, they are often hard to use and do not allow the control of compressive forces. Here, we present a set of microfluidic devices which all rely on the use of sliding elements consisting of microfabricated rods that can be inserted inside a microfluidic device. Sliding elements enable the creation of reconfigurable sealed culture chambers for the study of whole organisms or model micro-tissues. By confining the micro-tissues, we studied the biophysical impact of growth-induced pressure and showed that this mechanical stress is associated with an increase in macromolecular crowding, shedding light on this understudied type of mechanical stress. Our mechano-chemostat is an easy-to-use microfluidic device that allows the long-term culture of biological samples and can be used to study both the impact of specific conditions as well as the consequences of mechanical compression.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Small Methods
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.3%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
7
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Physics
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Nature Nanotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Advanced Materials
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
12
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
Nature Materials
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
15
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
16
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
17
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
Biofabrication
○ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
APL Bioengineering
● 19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.