Exponential diversity-dependent diversification emerges from an individual-based model with Lotka-Volterra competition
Pannetier, T.; Duthie, A. B.; Etienne, R. S.
Show abstract
AbstractA long-standing question in macroevolution is whether diversification is governed by the same processes that structure diversity at ecological scales, particularly competition. This competition has led to the development of a model where diversification rates depend on diversity, analogous to density-dependence in population growth models. Various versions of this model have been widely used for inference, where the rate of speciation and/or extinction can be either a linear or a power function of species number. It is, however, unknown if either approximates the diversification process that arises from the general ecological setting proposed to lead to diversity-dependence. This is of concern for inference, as failure to include a model that appropriately represents the hypothesized scenario is likely to lead to erroneous inference. Here we use an individual-based model adapted from adaptive dynamics, where fitness is governed by resource availability and the density of competitors, to determine the shape of the diversity-dependence functions. We find that the diversity-dependent rate of speciation produced by the individual-based model is best approximated by an exponential function of species diversity, consistent with a view of macroevolution where diversity increases rapidly after mass extinctions or when new adaptive space becomes available. Although we do find diversity-dependence in the extinction rate, it remains low over the entire process and erases its own signal, so it cannot be recovered from reconstructed phylogenies. The support for a linear relationship for diversity-dependent diversification found in many empirical phylogenies suggests that either our adaptive dynamics model of speciation is inadequate or there is too little information contained in reconstructed phylogenies. We indeed find evidence for the latter when pruning extinct species from our simulated phylogenies, but this does not rule out the former.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Evolutionary Relatedness on Species Diversification and Tree Shape 97%
- Adaptive diversification and niche packing on rugged fitness landscapes 96%
- Quantifying the effects of intraspecific trait variation and interspecific trait correlations on interacting populations - a nonlinear averaging approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the emergence of contingent and deterministic exclusion in multispecies communities 95%
- How community adaptation affects biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships 95%
- A general framework for species-abundance distributions: linking traits and dispersal to explain commonness and rarity 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.