Back

Multi-omic characterization reveals a distinct molecular landscape in young-onset pancreatic cancer

Ogobuiro, I. C.; Baca, Y.; Ribeiro, J. R.; Walker, P.; Wilson, G. C.; Gulhati, P.; Marshall, J.; Shroff, R. T.; Speltzer, D.; Oberley, M.; Abbott, D. E.; Kim, H. J.; Kooby, D. A.; Maithel, S. K.; Ahmad, S. A.; Merchant, N. B.; Xiu, J.; Hosein, P. J.; Datta, J.

2023-03-29 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.03.28.23287894 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeUsing a real-world database with matched genomic-transcriptomic molecular data, we sought to characterize the distinct molecular correlates underlying clinical differences between young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; <50-yrs.) and average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; [&ge;]70-yrs.) patients. MethodsWe analyzed matched whole-transcriptome and DNA sequencing data from 2430 patient samples (YOPC, n=292; AOPC, n=2138) from the Caris Life Sciences database (Phoenix, AZ). Immune deconvolution was performed using the quanTIseq pipeline. Overall survival (OS) data was obtained from insurance claims (n=4928); Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age-and molecularly-defined cohorts. Significance was determined as FDR-corrected P-values (Q)<0.05. ResultsYOPC patients had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), BRCA2-mutant, and PALB2-mutant tumors compared with AOPC patients, but fewer SMAD4-, RNF43-, CDKN2A-, and SF3B1-mutant tumors. Notably, YOPC patients demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS mutations compared with AOPC patients (81.3% vs. 90.9%; Q=0.004). In the KRAS-wildtype subset (n=227), YOPC tumors demonstrated fewer TP53 mutations and were more likely driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, while BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in AOPC patients. Immune deconvolution revealed significant enrichment of natural killer (NK) cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, and M2 macrophages in YOPC patients relative to AOPC patients, which corresponded with lower rates of HLA-DPA1 homozygosity. There was an association with improved OS in YOPC patients compared with AOPC patients with KRAS-wildtype tumors (median 16.2 [YOPC-KRASWT] vs. 10.6 [AOPC-KRASWT] months; P=0.008) but not KRAS-mutant tumors (P=0.084). ConclusionIn this large, real-world multi-omic characterization of age-stratified molecular differences in PDAC, YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape that has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
4
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
7
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
9
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
13
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
25
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%