Back

Early real world evidence on the relative SARS-COV-2 vaccine effectiveness of bivalent COVID-19 booster doses: a rapid review.

Sane Schepisi, M.

2023-03-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.03.28.23287762 medRxiv
Show abstract

The objective of this review is to give an overall view of COVID-19 bivalent vaccines knowledge and to explore their early available real world effectiveness evidence in the Omicron era. Presently, bivalent vaccines are generally offered to all groups eligible for their next booster, as defined by the national vaccination campaign, with varying policies between countries. The use of bivalent vaccines is supported by immunogenity studies, which, nevetheless, have led to contradictory conclusions, and are not generally designed to measure clinical impact. In order to critically appraise the available research on real world effectiveness, a systematic literature search was performed: out of 876 references examined, 14 studies were finally included and extracted. The findings of this review demonstrate modest to moderate additional protection of vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA-booster vaccines against COVID-19 associated illness and hospitalization, -if compared with having received a monovalent dose as booster-, during a period when BA.5 and other Omicron sublineage viruses predominated globally, Considering the complexity of the current immunity situation at global level, and the high level of heterogeneity both at study and at review level, these findings must be taken with caution. Further research on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is encouraged.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%