Back

HRD-One: CLINICAL VALIDATION AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. Comparison between Myriad's myChoice(R), SOPHiA GENETICS SOPHiA Homologous Recombination Solution(R) and AmoyDx HRD Focus Panel(R)

Kroll, J. E.; Bonaldi, A.; Pierry, P. M.; de Almeida, L. G. D.; de Souza, C. A.; Silva, J. S.; Villela, D.; Meliso, F. M.; Guarischi-Sousa, R.; Grillo Milanezi, M. F.; Scapulatempo Neto, C.; Yamamoto, G. L.

2023-03-29 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.03.28.21264560 medRxiv
Show abstract

Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) testing has become increasingly important in clinical genomic labs due to the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy for epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneum cancer. While sequencing and copy number variation analysis can identify patients with a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who can benefit from PARPi therapy, there are also patients who may benefit but do not have these mutations. To address this, our lab has developed a test called HRD-One, in partnership with SOPHiA GENETICS, that can detect sequence variants in genes involved in HRR, as well as genomic scars that indicate Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), which may be present even when a pathogenic variant is not detected. We tested 59 high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer samples using HRD-One and found that it had an overall categorical concordance of 94.74% with Myriads myChoice(R) score, which is a commercial HRD test. 12 out of 13 samples that carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 also had a positive HRD-One score, and 9 samples in which a pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 was not identified had a positive score in both HRD-One and myChoice(R). Of the samples that passed quality control, we observed an average of 1.62 points variation between replicates on a scale from -25.0 to +25.0. We also found that low-confidence results were associated with a low DNA input and the age of FFPE blocks, while the estimated tumor percentage in the block, NGS library yield, and score of genomic instability did not have a significant association. We determined that blocks older than 3 years or with a DNA input of less than 25ng are not reliable for producing high-quality results. Finally, we validated the HRD-One test with SOPHiA Homologous Recombination Solution (Library Prep kit II) and correlated it to myChoice(R), and found that the AmoyDx(R) HRD Focus Panel had the same sensitivity but a higher number of false positive samples and therefore lower specificity. Overall, we have shown that HRD-One can provide a reproducible and concordant score for inferring HRD, and an HRD-One score of 2.0 or greater predicts HRD and correlates to Myriads myChoice(R) score of 42 in high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancers samples that meet our minimum quality criteria.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
20
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%