Scaling deep phylogenetic embedding to ultra-large reference trees: a tree-aware ensemble approach
Jiang, Y.; McDonald, D.; Knight, R.; Mirarab, S.
Show abstract
Phylogenetic placement of a query sequence on a backbone tree is increasingly used across biomedical sciences to identify the content of a sample from its DNA content. The accuracy of such analyses depends on the density of the backbone tree, making it crucial that placement methods scale to very large trees. Moreover, a new paradigm has been recently proposed to place sequences on the species tree using single-gene data. The goal is to better characterize the samples and to enable combined analyses of marker-gene (e.g., 16S rRNA gene amplicon) and genome-wide data. The recent method DEPP enables performing such analyses using metric learning. However, metric learning is hampered by a need to compute and save a quadratically growing matrix of pairwise distances during training. Thus, DEPP (or any distance-based method) does not scale to more than roughly ten thousand species, a problem that we faced when trying to use our recently released Greengenes2 (GG2) reference tree containing 331,270 species. Scalability problems can be addressed in phylogenetics using divide- and-conquer. However, applying divide- and-conquer to data-hungry machine learning methods needs nuance. This paper explores divide- and-conquer for training ensembles of DEPP models, culminating in a method called C-DEPP that uses carefully crafted techniques to enable quasi-linear scaling while maintaining accuracy. C-DEPP enables placing twenty million 16S fragments on the GG2 reference tree in 41 hours of computation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GeneRax: A tool for species tree-aware maximum likelihood based gene tree inference under gene duplication, transfer, and loss. 98%
- Adaptive RAxML-NG: Accelerating Phylogenetic inference under Maximum Likelihood using dataset difficulty 97%
- From Easy to Hopeless - Predicting the Difficulty of Phylogenetic Analyses 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- PhyloFusion- Fast and easy fusion of rooted phylogenetic trees into rooted phylogenetic networks 97%
- Improved robustness to gene tree incompleteness, estimation errors, and systematic homology errors with weighted TREE-QMC 96%
- PhyloCNN: Improving tree representation and neural network architecture for deep learning from trees in phylodynamics and diversification studies 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.