Back

Predicting future conservation areas while avoiding competition in two alpine urodele amphibians severely threatened by climate change

Dubos, N.; Havard, A.; Crottini, A.; Seglie, D.; Andreone, F.

2023-03-25 ecology
10.1101/2023.03.24.534075 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change will cause important declines in species distributions, especially when living at high altitudes. The Critically Endangered Salamandra lanzai from SW Alps may be severely exposed to future climate change effects and its suitable climate may shrink or shift. Another Alpine salamander (S. atra) is present in the region, which in case of spatial overlap may represent a competitor for S. lanzai. It is urgent to estimate the effect of future climate change on these species and identify priority areas for conservation while accounting for competition between both species. With a Species Distribution Modelling (SDM) approach, we projected the current and future climate suitability of both salamander species. We accounted for uncertainty related to the methods (model replicates) and climate projections (data source, global circulation model and scenario) to provide a consensus map for practitioners. This map also takes into account potential competition with S. atra by penalizing the suitability scores of S. lanzai by the scores of S. atra. We predict a severe effect of climate change on both species. Most of the current habitats are projected to become largely unsuitable by 2070, regardless of the climatology and scenario. We identified important spatial disagreements between projections based on different data sources, mostly due to precipitation projections and daily temperature variation. This highlights the need to account for multiple climatologies in mountainous environments. Both species habitats are highly fragmented, which is expected to prevent distributional shifts through natural dispersion. We suggest to explore the possibility of translocation for the most threatened populations and simultaneously develop captive breeding programs. Biotic interactions are rarely accounted for in SDMs, and we encourage the documentation of species with similar ecological requirements to improve the relevance of SDMs for future conservation planning.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
6
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
20
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
26
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
28
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%