Back

Conserving genetic diversity during climate change:Niche marginality and discrepant monitoring capacity in Europe

Pearman, P. B.; Broennimann, O.; Albayrak, T.; Alves, P. C.; Bertola, L. D.; Biedrzycka, A.; Buzan, E.; Cubric-Curik, V.; Fedorca, A.; Godoy, J. A.; Hvilsom, C.; Klinga, P.; Konopinski, M. K.; Kopatz, A.; Laikre, L.; Lopez Fernandez, M.; Mergeay, J.; Neophytou, C.; Palsson, S.; Paz-Vinas, I.; Posledovich, D.; Roleckova, B.; Rungis, D.; Segelbacher, G.; Kavcic Sonnenschein, K.; Thurfjell, H.; Traeger, S.; Vernesi, C.; Vila, C.; Westergren, M.; Zachos, F. E.; Guisan, A.; Bruford, M.

2023-03-25 ecology
10.1101/2023.03.24.533448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic monitoring of populations currently attracts interest in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity but needs long-term planning and investments. Genetic diversity has been largely neglected in biodiversity monitoring, and when addressed is treated separately, detached from other conservation issues, such as habitat alteration due to climate change. Genetic monitoring supports the conservation and management of fisheries, game, and threatened populations. It also can contribute to the assessment of predicted and realized impacts of climate change, and their management. We report the first accounting of genetic monitoring efforts among countries in Europe (their genetic monitoring capacity, GMC) to determine where GMC suggests the combination of national infrastructure, political support and resources for continued and expanded monitoring. Overlaying GMC with areas where species ranges approach current and future climate niche limits (i.e., niche marginality) helps identify whether GMC coincides with anticipated climate change effects on biodiversity. Our analysis suggests that country area extent, financial resources, and conservation policy influence GMC, high values of which inconsistently match joint species patterns of climate niche marginality. Populations at niche margins likely hold genetic diversity that is important to adaptation to changing climate, and our results illuminate the need in Europe for expanded genetic monitoring across the climate gradients occupied by species, a need arguably greatest in southeastern European countries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
5
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
7
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
16
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
28
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%