Back

Rare genetic variants in SEC24D modify orofacial cleft phenotypes

Curtis, S.; Carlson, J. C.; Beaty, T.; Murray, J. C.; Weinberg, S. M.; Marazita, M. L.; Cotney, J.; Cutler, D.; Epstein, M.; Leslie, E.

2023-03-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.03.24.23287714 medRxiv
Show abstract

As one of the most common structural birth defects, orofacial clefts (OFCs) have been studied for decades, and recent studies have demonstrated that there are genetic differences between the different phenotypic presentations of OFCs. However, the contribution of rare genetic variation genome-wide to different subtypes of OFCs has been understudied, with most studies focusing on common genetic variation or rare variation within targeted regions of the genome. Therefore, we used whole-genome sequencing data from the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program to conduct a gene-based burden analysis to test for genetic modifiers of cleft lip (CL) vs cleft lip and palate (CLP). We found that there was a significantly increased burden of rare variants in SEC24D in CL cases compared to CLP cases (p=6.86x10-7). Of the 15 variants within SEC24D, 53.3% were synonymous, but overlapped a known craniofacial enhancer. We then tested whether these variants could alter predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), and found that the rare alleles destroyed binding sites for 9 transcription factors (TFs), including Pax1 (p=0.0009), and created binding sites for 23 TFs, including Pax6 (p=6.12x10-5) and Pax9 (p= 0.0001), which are known to be involved in normal craniofacial development, suggesting a potential mechanism by which these synonymous variants could have a functional impact. Overall, this study demonstrates that rare genetic variation contributes to the phenotypic heterogeneity of OFCs and suggests that regulatory variation may also contribute and warrant further investigation in future studies of genetic variants controlling risk to OFC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
11
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
15
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
25
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
27
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%