Back

A one-step deep learning framework for psoriasis area and severity prediction trained on interventional clinical trial images

Xing, Y.; Zhong, S.; Aronson, S. L.; Aronson, S. L.; Webster, D. E.; Crouthamel, M. H.; Wang, L.

2023-03-24 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2023.03.23.23287628 medRxiv
Show abstract

Image-based machine learning holds great promise for facilitating clinical care, however the datasets often used for model training differ from the interventional clinical trial-based findings frequently used to inform treatment guidelines. Here, we draw on longitudinal imaging of psoriasis patients undergoing treatment in the Ultima 2 clinical trial (NCT02684357), including 2,700 body images with psoriasis area severity index (PASI) annotations by uniformly trained dermatologists. An image-processing workflow integrating clinical photos of multiple body regions into one model pipeline was developed, which we refer to as the One-Step PASI framework due to its simultaneous body detection, lesion detection, and lesion severity classification. Group-stratified cross-validation was performed with 145 deep convolutional neural network models combined in an ensemble learning architecture. The highest-performing model demonstrated a mean absolute error of 3.3, Lins concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86, and Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.90 across a wide range of PASI scores comprising disease classifications of clear skin, mild, and moderate-to-severe disease. Within-person, time-series analysis of model performance demonstrated that PASI predictions closely tracked the trajectory of physician scores from severe to clear skin without systematically over or underestimating PASI scores or percent changes from baseline. This study demonstrates the potential of image processing and deep learning to translate otherwise inaccessible clinical trial data into accurate, extensible machine learning models to assess therapeutic efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.6%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
4
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%