Back

Distances and their visualization in studies of spatial-temporal genetic variation using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Georges, A.; Mijangos, L.; Patel, H. R.; Aitkens, M.; Gruber, B. R.

2023-05-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.03.22.533737 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIDistance measures are widely used for examining genetic structure in datasets that comprise many individuals scored for a very large number of attributes. Genotype datasets composed of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) typically contain bi-allelic scores for tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of loci. C_LIO_LIWe examine the application of distance measures to SNP genotypes and sequence tag presence-absences (SilicoDArT) and use real datasets and simulated data to illustrate pitfalls in the application of genetic distances and their visualization. C_LIO_LIEuclidean Distance is the metric of choice in many distance studies. However, other measures may be preferable because of their underlying models of divergence, population demographic history and linkage disequilibrium, because it is desirable to down-weight joint absences, or because of other characteristics specific to the data or analyses. Distance measures for SNP genotype data that depend on the arbitrary choice of reference and alternate alleles (e.g. Bray-Curtis distance) should not be used. Careful consideration should be given to which state is scored zero when applying binary distance measures to sequence tag presence-absences (e.g. Jaccard distance). C_LIO_LIMissing values that arise in the SNP discovery process can cause displacement of affected individuals from their natural groupings and artificial inflation of confidence envelopes, leading to potential misinterpretation. Filtering on missing values then imputing those that remain avoids distortion in visual representations. Failure of a distance measure to conform to metric and Euclidean properties is important but only likely to create unacceptable outcomes in extreme cases. Lack of randomness in the selection of individuals (e.g. inclusion of sibs) and lack of independence of both individuals and loci (e.g. polymorphic haploblocks), can lead to substantial and otherwise inexplicable distortions of the visual representations and again, potential misinterpretation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Open Source Software
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.6%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
18
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Forensic Science International: Genetics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%