Back

Low back pain service utilization and costs: association with timing of first-line services for individuals initially contacting a physician specialist. A retrospective cohort study

Elton, D.; Zhang, M.

2023-03-24 orthopedics
10.1101/2023.03.22.23287530
Show abstract

BackgroundPhysician specialists (PS) are often the type of healthcare provider initially contacted by an individual with low back pain (LBP). LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend a stepped approach to management with an emphasis on first-line non-pharmaceutical and non-interventional services. ObjectiveExamine the association between the incorporation of CPG recommended first-line services, exposure to second- and third-line services and total episode cost for individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a PS. DesignRetrospective observational study with identical design to previous study focused on primary care physicians. Setting/PatientsNational sample of individuals with non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019. MeasurementsIndependent variables were initial contact with a PS, and the timing of incorporation of five types of first-line services. Dependent measures included exposure to thirteen types of health care services and total episode cost. Results91,096 individuals were associated with 98,992 episodes of non-surgical LBP. 36.2% of the 33,277 PS initially contacted for an episode of LBP incorporated any first-line service at any time during an episode. A first-line service was provided in 24.0% of episodes with active care (19.5% of episodes), manual therapy (13.7%) and chiropractic manipulative therapy (6.5%) the most common. 7.3% of non-surgical LBP episodes included a first-line service within seven days of initial contact with a PS. These episodes were associated with a reduction in the use of prescription skeletal muscle relaxants (risk ratio (RR) 0.88) and opioids (RR 0.55), spinal injections (RR 0.84), and CT scans (RR 0.71), with no impact on the use of prescription NSAIDs, radiography, or MRI scans. First-line services were associated with an increase in total episode cost at any time of incorporation with chiropractic manipulation associated with the lowest cost increase. Younger individuals from zip codes with higher adjusted gross income were more likely to receive a first-line service in the first seven days of an episode. LimitationsAs a retrospective observational analysis of associations there are numerous potential confounders and limitations. ConclusionsFor individuals with non-surgical LBP PS provide second- or third-line services more frequently and earlier than CPG recommended first-line services. There is an opportunity to improve concordance with LBP CPGs for individuals with LBP initially contacting a PS.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 11%
1.9× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg
3
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
#1
195× avg
4
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 0.7%
11× avg
5
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
42× avg
6
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg
7
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.5%
27× avg
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 10%
2.7× avg
9
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 9%
2.9× avg
10
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 75%
1.4%
11
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.7%
22× avg
12
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 5%
4.5× avg
13
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
17× avg
14
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 18%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg