Low back pain service utilization and costs: association with timing of first-line services for individuals initially contacting a physician specialist. A retrospective cohort study
Elton, D.; Zhang, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPhysician specialists (PS) are often the type of healthcare provider initially contacted by an individual with low back pain (LBP). LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend a stepped approach to management with an emphasis on first-line non-pharmaceutical and non-interventional services. ObjectiveExamine the association between the incorporation of CPG recommended first-line services, exposure to second- and third-line services and total episode cost for individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a PS. DesignRetrospective observational study with identical design to previous study focused on primary care physicians. Setting/PatientsNational sample of individuals with non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019. MeasurementsIndependent variables were initial contact with a PS, and the timing of incorporation of five types of first-line services. Dependent measures included exposure to thirteen types of health care services and total episode cost. Results91,096 individuals were associated with 98,992 episodes of non-surgical LBP. 36.2% of the 33,277 PS initially contacted for an episode of LBP incorporated any first-line service at any time during an episode. A first-line service was provided in 24.0% of episodes with active care (19.5% of episodes), manual therapy (13.7%) and chiropractic manipulative therapy (6.5%) the most common. 7.3% of non-surgical LBP episodes included a first-line service within seven days of initial contact with a PS. These episodes were associated with a reduction in the use of prescription skeletal muscle relaxants (risk ratio (RR) 0.88) and opioids (RR 0.55), spinal injections (RR 0.84), and CT scans (RR 0.71), with no impact on the use of prescription NSAIDs, radiography, or MRI scans. First-line services were associated with an increase in total episode cost at any time of incorporation with chiropractic manipulation associated with the lowest cost increase. Younger individuals from zip codes with higher adjusted gross income were more likely to receive a first-line service in the first seven days of an episode. LimitationsAs a retrospective observational analysis of associations there are numerous potential confounders and limitations. ConclusionsFor individuals with non-surgical LBP PS provide second- or third-line services more frequently and earlier than CPG recommended first-line services. There is an opportunity to improve concordance with LBP CPGs for individuals with LBP initially contacting a PS.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 95%
- The economic burden of low back pain in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a prevalence-based cost-of-illness analysis from the healthcare provider’s perspective 93%
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices in UK primary care: a cohort study in the CPRD 89%
- Pre-morbid risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: prospective cohort study 86%
- Machine learning model predicts new-onset deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities after pelvic floor fracture surgery and targeted diagnosis 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 94%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 94%
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 91%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 88%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.