Back

Development and validation of a novel in-vivo vascular injury score for prediction of in-stent restenosis

Cornelissen, A.; Florescu, R. A.; Reese, S.; Behr, M.; Ranno, A.; Manjunatha, K.; Schaaps, N.; Boehm, C.; Liehn, E. A.; Zhao, L.; Nilcham, P.; Milzi, A.; Schroeder, J.; Vogt, F. J.

2023-03-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.22.23286988 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite optimizations of coronary stenting technology, a residual risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains. Vessel wall injury has important impact on the development of ISR. While injury can be assessed in histology, there is no injury score available to be used in clinical practice. MethodsSeven rats underwent abdominal aorta stent implantation. At 4 weeks after implantation, animals were euthanized, and strut indentation, defined as the impression of the strut into the vessel wall, as well as neointimal growth were assessed. Established histological injury scores were assessed to confirm associations between indentation and vessel wall injury. In addition, stent strut indentation was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an exemplary clinical case. ResultsStent strut indentation was associated with vessel wall injury in histology. Furthermore, indentation was positively correlated with neointimal thickness, both in the per-strut analysis (r=0.5579) and in the per-section analysis (r=0.8620; both p [≤]0.001). In a clinical case, indentation quantification in OCT was feasible, enabling assessment of injury in vivo. ConclusionAssessing stent strut indentation enables periprocedural assessment of stent-induced damage in vivo and therefore allows for optimization of stent implantation. The assessment of stent strut indentation might become a valuable tool in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.