Development and validation of a novel in-vivo vascular injury score for prediction of in-stent restenosis
Cornelissen, A.; Florescu, R. A.; Reese, S.; Behr, M.; Ranno, A.; Manjunatha, K.; Schaaps, N.; Boehm, C.; Liehn, E. A.; Zhao, L.; Nilcham, P.; Milzi, A.; Schroeder, J.; Vogt, F. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite optimizations of coronary stenting technology, a residual risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains. Vessel wall injury has important impact on the development of ISR. While injury can be assessed in histology, there is no injury score available to be used in clinical practice. MethodsSeven rats underwent abdominal aorta stent implantation. At 4 weeks after implantation, animals were euthanized, and strut indentation, defined as the impression of the strut into the vessel wall, as well as neointimal growth were assessed. Established histological injury scores were assessed to confirm associations between indentation and vessel wall injury. In addition, stent strut indentation was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an exemplary clinical case. ResultsStent strut indentation was associated with vessel wall injury in histology. Furthermore, indentation was positively correlated with neointimal thickness, both in the per-strut analysis (r=0.5579) and in the per-section analysis (r=0.8620; both p [≤]0.001). In a clinical case, indentation quantification in OCT was feasible, enabling assessment of injury in vivo. ConclusionAssessing stent strut indentation enables periprocedural assessment of stent-induced damage in vivo and therefore allows for optimization of stent implantation. The assessment of stent strut indentation might become a valuable tool in clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a novel murine model of in-stent neoatherosclerosis 97%
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 95%
- Age-stratified Prevalence and Relative Prognostic Significance of Traditional Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Report from the Nationwide Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 94%
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 94%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Full-field optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis 96%
- In vivo recellularization of xenogeneic vascular grafts decellularized with high hydrostatic pressure method in a porcine carotid arterial interpose model 96%
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Stabilize Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Diabetes Mellitus 95%
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 95%
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Affect Activated Clotting Time During and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.