The influence of the bullseye versus standard fixation cross on eye movements and classifying natural images from EEG
Häberle, G.; Celikkol, A. P.; Cichy, R. M.
Show abstract
Withdrawn StatementThe authors have withdrawn this manuscript because we detected fundamental errors in the formula we used to convert eye tracking data (x and y coordinates) from pixels to degrees. After addressing these errors, the results changed considerably. On the one hand, the behavioral results point towards differences for the bullseye versus the standard fixation cross different and larger than originally reported. However, the eyetracking decoding difference between standard and bullseye fixation cross is no longer significant. Therefore, the main claim of the paper - that bullseye fixation cross leads to lower eye movements compared to standard fixation cross, in turn resulting in lower decoding performance of object identity for eyetracking and EEG data - no longer stands. Given this change in the main results, we therefore withdraw the preprint.. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic expectations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of sub-second updates in reward predictions 95%
- Opposing neural processing modes alternate rhythmically during sustained auditory attention 95%
- Light modulates task-dependent thalamo-cortical connectivity during an auditory attentional task 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.