Back

Ability of Caprini and Padua Risk-Assessment Models to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in a Nationwide Study

Hayssen, H.; Sahoo, S.; Nguyen, P.; Mayorga-Carlin, M.; Siddiqui, T.; Englum, B.; Slejko, J. F.; Mullins, D.; Yesha, Y.; Sorkin, J. D.; Lal, B. K.

2023-03-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.20.23287506
Show abstract

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable complication of hospitalization. Risk-stratification is the cornerstone of prevention. The Caprini and Padua are the most commonly used risk-assessment models to quantify VTE risk. Both models perform well in select, high-risk cohorts. While VTE risk-stratification is recommended for all hospital admissions, few studies have evaluated the models in a large, unselected cohort of patients. MethodsWe analyzed consecutive first hospital admissions of 1,252,460 unique surgical and non-surgical patients to 1,298 VA facilities nationwide between January 2016 and December 2021. Caprini and Padua scores were generated using the VAs national data repository. We first assessed the ability of the two RAMs to predict VTE within 90 days of admission. In secondary analyses, we evaluated prediction at 30 and 60 days, in surgical versus non-surgical patients, after excluding patients with upper extremity DVT, in patients hospitalized [≥]72 hours, after including all-cause mortality in the composite outcome, and after accounting for prophylaxis in the predictive model. We used area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) as the metric of prediction. ResultsA total of 330,388 (26.4%) surgical and 922,072 (73.6%) non-surgical consecutively hospitalized patients (total n=1,252,460) were analyzed. Caprini scores ranged from 0-28 (median, interquartile range: 4, 3-6); Padua scores ranged from 0-13 (1, 1-3). The RAMs showed good calibration and higher scores were associated with higher VTE rates. VTE developed in 35,557 patients (2.8%) within 90 days of admission. The ability of both models to predict 90-day VTE was low (AUCs: Caprini 0.56 [95% CI 0.56-0.56], Padua 0.59 [0.58-0.59]). Prediction remained low for surgical (Caprini 0.54 [0.53-0.54], Padua 0.56 [0.56-0.57]) and non-surgical patients (Caprini 0.59 [0.58-0.59], Padua 0.59 [0.59-0.60]). There was no clinically meaningful change in predictive performance in patients admitted for [≥]72 hours, after excluding upper extremity DVT from the outcome, after including all-cause mortality in the outcome, or after accounting for ongoing VTE prophylaxis. ConclusionsCaprini and Padua risk-assessment model scores have low ability to predict VTE events in a cohort of unselected consecutive hospitalizations. Improved VTE risk-assessment models must be developed before they can be applied to a general hospital population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.6%
2
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 0.9%
10.5%
4
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 0.7%
6.6%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 5%
5.5%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 33%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 24%
4.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
9
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 6%
2.3%
11
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 8%
2.3%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
15
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
17
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 40%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 33%
0.7%
25
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%