BRCA1 secondary splice-site mutations drive exon-skipping and PARP inhibitor resistance
Nesic, K.; Krais, J. J.; Vandenberg, C. J.; Wang, Y.; Patel, P.; Kwan, T.; Lieschke, E.; Ho, G.-Y.; Barker, H. E.; Bedo, J.; Casadei, S.; Farrell, A.; Radke, M.; Shield-Artin, K.; Penington, J. S.; Geissler, F.; Zhang, F.; Dobrovic, A.; Olesen, I.; Kristeleit, R.; Oza, A.; Ratnayake, G.; Traficante, N.; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, ; DeFazio, A.; Bowtell, D. D. L.; Harding, T. C.; Lin, K.; Swisher, E. M.; Kondrashova, O.; Scott, C. L.; Johnson, N.; Wakefield, M. J.
Show abstract
BRCA1 splice isoforms {Delta}11 and {Delta}11q can contribute to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) resistance by splicing-out the mutation-containing exon, producing truncated, partially-functional proteins. However, the clinical impact and underlying drivers of BRCA1 exon skipping remain undetermined. We analyzed nine ovarian and breast cancer patient derived xenografts (PDX) with BRCA1 exon 11 frameshift mutations for exon skipping and therapy response, including a matched PDX pair derived from a patient pre- and post-chemotherapy/PARPi. BRCA1 exon 11 skipping was elevated in PARPi resistant PDX tumors. Two independent PDX models acquired secondary BRCA1 splice site mutations (SSMs), predicted in silico to drive exon skipping. Predictions were confirmed using qRT-PCR, RNA sequencing, western blots and BRCA1 minigene modelling. SSMs were also enriched in post-PARPi ovarian cancer patient cohorts from the ARIEL2 and ARIEL4 clinical trials. We demonstrate that SSMs drive BRCA1 exon 11 skipping and PARPi resistance, and should be clinically monitored, along with frame-restoring secondary mutations. Statement of significanceFew PARPi resistance mechanisms have been confirmed in the clinical setting. While secondary/reversion mutations typically restore a genes reading frame, we have identified secondary mutations in patient cohorts that hijack splice sites to enhance mutation-containing exon skipping, resulting in the overexpression of BRCA1 hypomorphs, which in turn promote PARPi resistance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Overcoming clinical resistance to EZH2 inhibition using rational epigenetic combination therapy 95%
- Evolutionary Origins of Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer 95%
- The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting EIF4A triggers an interferon response to synergize with chemotherapy and suppress triple-negative breast cancer 95%
- PI3K/mTOR is a therapeutically targetable genetic dependency in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma 95%
- Prostate cancer androgen receptor activity dictates efficacy of Bipolar Androgen Therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline and somatic genetic variants in the p53 pathway interact to affect cancer risk, progression and drug response 96%
- Acquired RAD51C promoter methylation loss causes PARP inhibitor resistance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma 96%
- Biomarker-guided treatment strategies for ovarian cancer identified from a heterogeneous panel of patient-derived tumor xenografts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinically-relevant treatment of PDX models reveals patterns of neuroblastoma chemoresistance 96%
- Gene Regulatory Network topology governs resistance and treatment escape in glioma stem-like cells 95%
- CDK4/6 inhibition enhances SHP2 inhibitor efficacy and is dependent upon restoration of RB function in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional Characterization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas with FUS-TFCP2 or EWSR1-TFCP2 Fusions 95%
- Anti-CSF-1R therapy with combined immuno- chemotherapy coordinate an adaptive immune response to eliminate macrophage enriched Triple Negative Breast Cancers 94%
- FOXJ1 mediates taxane resistance through regulation of microtubule dynamics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.