Back

Psychophysical pain encoding in the cingulate cortex predicts responsiveness of electrical stimulation

Caston, R.; Smith, E. H.; Davis, T. S.; Singh, H.; Rahimpour, S.; Rolston, J. D.

2023-03-18 surgery
10.1101/2023.03.18.23287266
Show abstract

BackgroundThe anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays an important role in the cognitive and emotional processing of pain. Prior studies have used deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat chronic pain, but results have been inconsistent. This may be due to network adaptation over time and variable causes of chronic pain. Identifying patient-specific pain network features may be necessary to determine patient candidacy for DBS. HypothesisCingulate stimulation would increase patients hot pain thresholds if non-stimulation 70-150 Hz activity encoded psychophysical pain responses. MethodsIn this study, four patients who underwent intracranial monitoring for epilepsy monitoring participated in a pain task. They placed their hand on a device capable of eliciting thermal pain for five seconds and rated their pain. We used these results to determine the individuals thermal pain threshold with and without electrical stimulation. Two different types of generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLME) were employed to assess the neural representations underlying binary and graded pain psychophysics. ResultsThe pain threshold for each patient was determined from the psychometric probability density function. Two patients had a higher pain threshold with stimulation than without, while the other two patients had no difference. We also evaluated the relationship between neural activity and pain responses. We found that patients who responded to stimulation had specific time windows where high-frequency activity was associated with increased pain ratings. ConclusionStimulation of cingulate regions with increased pain-related neural activity was more effective at modulating pain perception than stimulating non-responsive areas. Personalized evaluation of neural activity biomarkers could help identify the best target for stimulation and predict its effectiveness in future studies evaluating DBS.

Matching journals

1
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
#1
70× avg
2
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
#1
54× avg
3
Neurobiology of Disease
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
#1
102× avg
4
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 0.5%
47× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 68%
5.1%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.5%
48× avg
7
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
8
PLOS Computational Biology
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 141 published papers
Top 3%
9.6× avg
9
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 56%
2.7%
10
NeuroImage
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
11
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.9%
19× avg
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
13
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
BMJ · based on 26 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
14
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 10%
1.8× avg
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
16
Cerebral Cortex
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1.0%
20× avg
17
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 26%
0.9%
18
Epilepsia
Wiley · based on 27 published papers
Top 1%
4.9× avg
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.9%
15× avg