Does nonlinear blood-brain barrier transport matter for morphine dosing strategies?
Gulave, B.; Budda, D.; Saleh, M. A.; van Hasselt, J. G. C.; de Lange, E. C. M.
Show abstract
Morphine blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport is governed by passive diffusion, active efflux and saturable active influx. These processes may be associated with nonlinear concentration-dependencies which impact plasma and brain extracellular fluid (brainECF) pharmacokinetics of morphine. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of nonlinear BBB transport on brainECF pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites for different dosing strategies using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulation study. We extended the human physiologically based pharmacokinetic, LeiCNS-PK3.0, model with equations for nonlinear BBB transport of morphine. Simulations for brainECF pharmacokinetics were performed for various dosing strategies: intravenous (IV), oral immediate (IR) and extended release (ER) with dose range of 0.25-150mg and dosing frequencies of 1-6 times daily. The impact of nonlinear BBB transport on morphine CNS pharmacokinetics was evaluated by quantifying (i) the relative brainECF to plasma exposure (AUCu,brainECF/AUCu,Plasma) and (ii) the impact on the peak-to-trough ratio (PTR) of concentration-time profiles in brainECF and plasma. We found that the relative morphine exposure and PTRs are dose dependent for the evaluated dose range. The highest relative morphine exposure value of 1.4 was found for once daily 0.25mg ER and lowest of 0.1 for 6-daily 150mg IV dosing. At lower doses the PTRs were smaller and increased with increasing dose and stabilized at higher doses independent of dosing frequency. Relative peak concentrations of morphine in relation to its metabolites changed with increasing dose. We conclude that nonlinearity of morphine BBB transport affect the relative brainECF exposure and the fluctuation of morphine and its metabolites. HighlightsNonlinear transport affects relative morphine exposure in brainECF. Nonlinear transport affects PK fluctuations of morphine in brainECF. Nonlinear transport affects brainECF PK relationship of morphine and its metabolites. Graphical abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PBPK modelling of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 and liver disease 94%
- Pharmacokinetics of caffeine: A systematic analysis of reported data for application in metabolic phenotyping and liver function testing 93%
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of the role of CYP2D6 polymorphism for metabolic phenotyping with dextromethorphan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved bioavailability of montelukast through a novel oral mucoadhesive film in humans and mice 93%
- Development of Remdesivir as a Dry Powder for Inhalation by Thin Film Freezing 91%
- Amorphous solid dispersions and the confounding effect of nanoparticles in in vitro dissolution and in vivo testing: Niclosamide as a case of study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Physiologically Based Liver Distribution Model that Incorporates Intracellular Lipid Partitioning and Binding to Fatty Acid Binding Protein 1 (FABP1) 94%
- RTICBM-74 is a Brain-Penetrant CB1 Receptor Allosteric Modulator that Reduces Alcohol Intake in Rats 91%
- Preliminary pharmacokinetics and in vivo studies indicate analgesic and stress mitigation effects of a novel NMDA receptor modulator 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- DigiLoCS: A Leap Forward in Predictive Organ-on-Chip Simulations 94%
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
- Effects of a rifampicin pre-treatment on linezolid pharmacokinetics 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.