Back

NVX-CoV2373 Vaccine Efficacy Against Hospitalization: A post hoc analysis of the PREVENT-19 phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Marchese, A. M.; Zhou, X.; Kinol, J.; Underwood, E.; Woo, W.; McGarry, A.; Beyhaghi, H.; Anez, G.; Toback, S.; Dunkle, L. M.

2023-03-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.03.17.23287306 medRxiv
Show abstract

PREVENT-19, the pivotal phase 3 trial of the Novavax adjuvanted, recombinant spike protein COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) demonstrated that the vaccine was safe and efficacious (vaccine efficacy, VE= 90%) for the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19. In the trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 2 doses of NVX-CoV2373 or placebo 21 days apart. Throughout the study, SARS-CoV-2 circulating variant was predominantly alpha, but other variants circulated (i.e., beta, gamma, epsilon, and iota). VE among the per-protocol efficacy analysis population was calculated according to pre-specified disease severity (mild, moderate, or severe) criteria, but the impact on the risk of COVID-19- associated hospitalization was not specifically investigated. During the placebo-controlled portion of the trial (January 25, 2021, to April 30, 2021), 4 hospitalizations occurred among the 77 events analyzed for the primary endpoint using the per-protocol population, 0 among vaccine recipients and 4 among placebo recipients, yielding a VE against hospitalization of 100% (95% CI: 28.8, 100). Among an expanded efficacy population, which included COVID-19-associated hospitalizations without a requirement for diagnostic polymerase chain reaction testing performed at the study central laboratory, 12 total hospitalizations were identified, 0 among vaccine recipients and 12 among placebo recipients, yielding a post hoc VE against hospitalization of 100% (95% CI: 83.1, 100). These additional data from the PREVENT-19 trial provide relevant public health information concerning the attributes of NVX-CoV2373.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.9%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
5
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
24
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%