The Neurochemical Mechanisms Underlying the Enhancing Effects of Rewards and Punishments on Motor Performance
Hamel, R.; Pearson, J.; Sifi, L.; Patel, D.; Hinder, M. R.; Jenkinson, N.; Galea, J.
Show abstract
Monetary rewards and punishments enhance motor performance and are associated with corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases within the motor cortex (M1) during movement preparation. However, such CSE changes have unclear origins; they could stem from increased glutamatergic (GLUTergic) facilitation and/or decreased type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA)-mediated inhibition within M1. To investigate this, paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess GLUTergic facilitation and GABAA inhibition within M1 whilst participants prepared to execute 4-element finger-press sequences. Behaviourally, rewards and punishments enhanced both reaction and movement times. Neurochemically, regardless of rewards or punishments, a digit-specific increase in GLUTergic facilitation and digit-unspecific decrease in GABAA inhibition occurred during preparation as movement onset approached. In parallel, both rewards and punishments non-specifically increased GLUTergic facilitation, but only rewards non-specifically decreased GABAA inhibition during preparation. This suggests that, to enhance performance, rewards both increase GLUTergic facilitation and decrease GABAA inhibition whilst punishments selectively increase GLUTergic facilitation. A control experiment revealed that such changes were not observed post-movement as participants processed reward and punishment feedback, indicating they were selective to movement preparation. Collectively, these results map the neurochemical changes in M1 by which incentives enhance motor performance.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward-driven enhancements in motor control are robust to TMS manipulation 95%
- Regional and age-dependent Effects of Cortical Magnetic Stimulation on Unconstrained Reaching Behavior 95%
- Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interhemispheric inhibition between dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices is released during preparation of unimanual but not bimanual movements. 93%
- Inhibitory Effect of Subthreshold TMS on the Long-latency Response in the Flexor Carpi Radialis 92%
- The recruitment of indirect-waves within primary motor cortex during motor imagery: A directional Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reinforcement motor learning after cerebellar damage is related to state estimation 93%
- The polarity specific nature of single session high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex on motor and non-motor task performance 92%
- Cerebellar tDCS alters the perception of optic flow 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.