Germline-mediated immunoediting sculpts breast cancer subtypes and metastatic proclivity
Houlahan, K. E.; Khan, A.; Greenwald, N. F.; West, R. B.; Angelo, M.; Curtis, C.
Show abstract
Cancer represents a broad spectrum of molecularly and morphologically diverse diseases. Individuals with the same clinical diagnosis can have tumors with drastically different molecular profiles and clinical response to treatment. It remains unclear when these differences arise during disease course and why some tumors are addicted to one oncogenic pathway over another. Somatic genomic aberrations occur within the context of an individuals germline genome, which can vary across millions of polymorphic sites. An open question is whether germline differences influence somatic tumor evolution. Interrogating 3,855 breast cancer lesions, spanning pre-invasive to metastatic disease, we demonstrate that germline variants in highly expressed and amplified genes influence somatic evolution by modulating immunoediting at early stages of tumor development. Specifically, we show that the burden of germline-derived epitopes in recurrently amplified genes selects against somatic gene amplification in breast cancer. For example, individuals with a high burden of germline-derived epitopes in ERBB2, encoding human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), are significantly less likely to develop HER2-positive breast cancer compared to other subtypes. The same holds true for recurrent amplicons that define four subgroups of ER-positive breast cancers at high risk of distant relapse. High epitope burden in these recurrently amplified regions is associated with decreased likelihood of developing high risk ER-positive cancer. Tumors that overcome such immune-mediated negative selection are more aggressive and demonstrate an "immune cold" phenotype. These data show the germline genome plays a previously unappreciated role in dictating somatic evolution. Exploiting germline-mediated immunoediting may inform the development of biomarkers that refine risk stratification within breast cancer subtypes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer Drivers are Recurrent Transcriptional Regulatory Heterogeneities in Early-stage Luminal Breast Cancer 97%
- Neoplastic immune mimicry potentiates breast tumor progression 97%
- Germline and somatic genetic variants in the p53 pathway interact to affect cancer risk, progression and drug response 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Copy number losses of oncogenes and gains of tumor suppressor genes generate common driver events of human cancer 95%
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 94%
- Integrative spatial omics reveals distinct tumor-promoting multicellular niches and immunosuppressive mechanisms in Black American and White American patients with TNBC 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interplay between Desmoglein2 and hypoxia controls metastasis in breast cancer 95%
- Circulating immune cell phenotype dynamics reflect the strength of tumor-immune cell interactions in patients during immunotherapy 94%
- Large scale functional screen identifies genetic variants with splicing effects in modern and archaic humans 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.