Back

Shaken, not shifted: Genotypic variation tunes how interspecific competition shapes niches

Costa-Pereira, R.; Fragata, I.; Mira, A. F.; Masseliere, M. C. d. l.; Hortal, J.; Magalhaes, S.

2023-03-16 ecology
10.1101/2023.03.15.532847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Individual variation in resource use as well as in the response to competitors has been recognized as playing an important role is species interactions. Still, we have as yet little information on whether such responses have a genetic basis as well as on how they affect each other. Here, we tested whether 20 genetically inbred lines of the spider mite Tetranychus evansi vary in their response to a gradient of cadmium concentration within plants as well as in their propensity to reshape niches when facing interspecific competition along this gradient. In absence of interspecific competitors, most lines were negatively affected by cadmium, albeit often in a non-linear fashion. Morevoer, half of the lines exhibited changes in the curvature of the relationship between number of females and cadmium concentration when facing competition with the congeneric T. urticae. Inbred lines also showed a shallower decay in offspring number along the cadmium gradient in presence of interspecific competition. Our findings provide evidence for large, partly genetic, variation in resource use and in the response to interspecific competition in heterogeneous environments. Moreover, we show that genotype responses to interspecific competition is contingent upon their response to an environmental gradient. Together, our results thus emphasize the importance of considering intraspecific variation in responses to interspecific competition, providing novel insights to link intra- and interspecific levels of biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.7%
2
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
11
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
12
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
15
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
19
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
28
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
30
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%