Back

Neural and behavioral correlates of edible cannabis-induced poisoning: characterizing a novel preclinical model

Amissah, R. Q.; Kayir, H.; Talhat, M. A.; Hassan, A.; Gu, Y.; Johnson, R.; Urban, K.; Khokhar, J. Y.

2023-05-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.03.15.532815 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accidental exposure to {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing edible cannabis, leading to cannabis poisoning, is common in children and pets; however, the neural mechanisms underlying these poisonings remain unknown. Therefore, we examined the effects of acute edible cannabis-induced poisoning on neural activity and behavior. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats (6 males, 7 females) were implanted with electrodes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsal hippocampus (dHipp), cingulate cortex (Cg), and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Cannabis poisoning was then induced by exposure to a mixture of Nutella (6 g/kg) and THC-containing cannabis oil (20 mg/kg). Subsequently, cannabis tetrad and neural oscillations were examined 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after THC exposure. In another cohort (16 males, 15 females), we examined the effects of cannabis poisoning on learning and prepulse inhibition, and the serum and brain THC and 11-hydroxy-THC concentrations. Cannabis poisoning resulted in sex differences in brain and serum THC and 11-hydroxy-THC levels over a 24-h period. It also caused gamma power suppression in the Cg, dHipp, and NAc in a sex- and time-dependent manner. Cannabis poisoning also resulted in hypolocomotion, hypothermia, and anti-nociception in a time-dependent manner and impairments in learning and prepulse inhibition. Our results suggest that the impairments in learning and information processing may be due to the decreased gamma power in the dHipp and PFC. Additionally, most of the changes in neural activity and behavior appear 2 hours after ingestion, suggesting that interventions at or before this time might be effective in reversing or reducing the effects of cannabis poisoning.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.