Reimbursement for Maxillofacial Surgery: Regional Analysis of the Physician Fee Schedule Reveals Unique Payment Increases in the Western United States From 2010 to 2019
Tran, A. T.; Diaz, M. J.; Batchu, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionMedicare Part B reimbursement data has been thoroughly evaluated in several surgical subspecialties to date, with significant ramifications for continued policy research and payment reform discussions. However, trends in maxillofacial surgery payment remain unstudied. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study of Part B reimbursement data, we analyzed regional trends in reimbursement for common maxillofacial repair and reconstruction procedures (N=17). All payment data converted to January 2019 United States dollars. ResultsFrom 2010 to 2019, fees for maxillofacial surgery evidenced strong region- and procedures-specific changes. After adjusting for inflation, the Southern United States reported an unweighted mean change in Medicare reimbursement of negative 12.59% (SD = 2.63%), while the Western United States reported an unweighted mean change in Medicare reimbursement of +0.08% (SD = 2.82%). In the Midwest, only Part B billing for reconstruction of the mandibular rami and/or body without internal rigid fixation (CPT code 21195) kept up with inflation. In the West, 8 CPT codes (47%) kept up with inflation: 21422, 21246, 21196, 21195, 21194, 21193, 21048, and 21046. In the Northeast and the South, all analyzed procedures reported decreased reimbursement rates after adjusting for inflation. ConclusionReimbursement for maxillofacial surgery has lagged behind inflation with pronounced regional bias.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 93%
- Differences in Characteristics of Medicare Patients Treated by Ophthalmologists and Optometrists 92%
- Postoperative mortality analysis of national Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database with a focus on regional comparisons and changes over time 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 88%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 88%
- Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators: A rapid evidence review 87%
- Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic 85%
- Navigating hospitals safely through the COVID-19 epidemic tide: predicting case load for adjusting bed capacity 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.