Back

Air pollution and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk

Moderato, L.; Aschieri, D.; Lazzeroni, D.; Rossi, L.; Bricoli, S.; Biagi, A.; Ferraro, S.; Binno, S.; Monello, A.; Pellizzoni, V.; Sticozzi, C.; Zanni, A.; Magnani, G.; Gurgoglione, F. L.; CAPUCCI, A.; Nani, S.; Montone, R. A.; Ardissino, D.; Nicolini, F.; Niccoli, G.

2023-03-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.15.23287335 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGlobally nearly 20% of cardiovascular disease deaths were attributable to air pollution. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) represents a major public health problem, therefore, the identification of novel OHCA triggers is of crucial relevance. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between air pollution (short-, mid-and long-term exposure) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) risk, during a 7 years-period from a highly polluted urban area with a high density of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). Methods and resultsOHCA were prospectively collected from the "Progetto Vita Database" between 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2017; day-by-day air pollution levels were extracted from the Environmental Protection Agency (ARPA) stations. Electrocardiograms of OHCA interventions were collected from the AEDs data cards. Day-by-day particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and 10, ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels were measured. A total of 880 OHCAs occurred in 748 days. A significantly increased in OHCA risk with the progressive increase in PM 2.5, PM 10, CO and NO2 levels was found. After adjustment for temperature and seasons, a 9% and 12% increase of OHCA risk for each 10 g/m3 increase of PM 10 (p< 0.0001) and PM 2.5 (p< 0.0001) levels was found. Air pollutants levels were associated with both asystole and shockable rhythm risk while no correlation was found with pulseless electrical activity. ConclusionsShort-term and mid-term exposure to PM 2.5 and PM 10 is independently associated with the risk of OHCA due to asystole or shockable rhythm.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.