Back

Endophyte genomes support greater metabolic gene cluster diversity compared with non-endophytes in Trichoderma

Scott, K.; Konkel, Z.; Gluck-Thaler, E.; David, G. E. V.; Simmt, C. F.; Grootmyers, D.; Chaverri, P.; Slot, J.

2023-03-15 genomics
10.1101/2023.03.14.532605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trichoderma is a cosmopolitan genus with diverse lifestyles and nutritional modes, including mycotrophy, saprophytism, and endophytism. Previous research has reported greater metabolic gene repertoires in endophytic fungal species compared to closely-related non-endophytes. However, the extent of this ecological trend and its underlying mechanisms are unclear. Some endophytic fungi may also be mycotrophs and have one or more mycoparasitism mechanisms. Mycotrophic endophytes are prominent in certain genera like Trichoderma, therefore, the mechanisms that enable these fungi to colonize both living plants and fungi may be the result of expanded metabolic gene repertoires. Our objective was to determine what, if any, genomic features are overrepresented in endophytic fungi genomes in order to undercover the genomic underpinning of the fungal endophytic lifestyle. Here we compared metabolic gene cluster and mycoparasitism gene diversity across a dataset of thirty-eight Trichoderma genomes representing the full breadth of environmental Trichodermas diverse lifestyles and nutritional modes. We generated four new Trichoderma endophyticum genomes to improve the sampling of endophytic isolates from this genus. As predicted, endophytic Trichoderma genomes contained, on average, more total biosynthetic and degradative gene clusters than non-endophytic isolates, suggesting that the ability to create/modify a diversity of metabolites potential is beneficial or necessary to the endophytic fungi. Still, once the phylogenetic signal was taken in consideration, no particular class of metabolic gene cluster was independently associated with the Trichoderma endophytic lifestyle. Several mycoparasitism genes, but no chitinase genes, were associated with endophytic Trichoderma genomes. Most genomic differences between Trichoderma lifestyles and nutritional modes are difficult to disentangle from phylogenetic divergences among species, suggesting that Trichoderma genomes maybe particularly well-equipped for lifestyle plasticity. We also consider the role of endophytism in diversifying secondary metabolism after identifying the horizontal transfer of the ergot alkaloid gene cluster to Trichoderma.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
6
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
19
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
22
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
25
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
30
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%