Back

Population-level annotation of lncRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals extensive expression and epigenetic variability associated with TE-like silencing

Kornienko, A. E.; Nizhynska, V.; Molla Morales, A.; Pisupati, R.; Nordborg, M.

2023-03-15 genomics
10.1101/2023.03.14.532599 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are understudied and underannotated in plants. In mammals, lncRNA loci are nearly as ubiquitous as protein-coding genes, and their expression is highly variable between individuals of the same species. Using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model, we aimed to understand the true scope of lncRNA transcription across plants from different regions and study its natural variation. We used transcriptome deep sequencing datasets spanning hundreds of natural accessions and several developmental stages to create a population-wide annotation of lncRNAs, revealing thousands of previously unannotated lncRNA loci. While lncRNA transcription is ubiquitous in the genome, most loci appear to be actively silenced and their expression is extremely variable between natural accessions. This high expression variability is largely caused by the high variability of repressive chromatin levels at lncRNA loci. High variability was particularly common for intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs), where pieces of transposable elements (TEs) present in 50% of these lincRNA loci are associated with increased silencing and variation, and such lncRNAs tend to be targeted by the TE silencing machinery. We create a population-wide lncRNA annotation in A. thaliana and improve our understanding of plant lncRNA genome biology, raising fundamental questions about what causes transcription and silencing across the genome. One-sentence summarylncRNA loci are plentiful in the A. thaliana genome, but their expression is extremely variable and largely repressed, with TE pieces enriched in intergenic lncRNAs aiding variability and silencing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.