Back

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain as a parameter of mild myocardial dysfunction in athletes after COVID-19

Schellenberg, J.; Ahathaller, M.; Matits, L.; Kirsten, J.; Kersten, J.; Steinacker, J.

2023-03-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.14.23287258 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhether impaired left ventricular (LV) function contributes to persistent cardiopulmonary symptoms or decreased exercise capacity after COVID-19 remains unclear. The aim of this prospective study was to determine differences in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) between athletes who did not have a history of LV dysfunction but had a positive COVID-19 test (PCAt) and healthy control (CON) athletes and relate them to symptoms during COVID-19. MethodsWe performed 151 transthoracic echocardiographies in our high-performance laboratory. GLS was determined in four-, two-, and three-chamber views and assessed offline by a blinded investigator in 88 PCAt (35% women) at a median of two months after COVID-19 who trained at least three times per week with more than 20 MET per week and 52 CONs from the German national squad (38% women). ResultsGLS was significantly lower (GLS -18.53{+/-}1.94% vs. -19.94{+/-}1.42%, p<0.001) and diastolic function significantly reduced (E/A 1.54{+/-}0.52 vs. 1.66{+/-}0.43, p=0.020; El 0.15{+/-}0.04 vs. 0.17{+/-}0.04, p=0.009; E/El 5.74{+/-}1.74 vs. 5.22{+/-}1.36, p=0.024) in PCAt. There was no association between GLS and acute symptoms like resting dyspnea, exertional dyspnea during or after COVID-19, palpitations, chest pain or increased resting heart rate. However, there was a trend toward lower GLS in PCAt with subjectively perceived performance limitation (p=0.054). ConclusionsIn a cohort of athletes at a median two months after COVID-19, significantly lower GLS and diastolic function were observed, suggesting mild myocardial dysfunction. GLS could be used as a screening element during return-to-sport examinations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.