Behavioral and neuroimaging correlates of attentional biases to angry faces in individuals in remission from depression: a population-derived study
Nagrodzki, J.; Passamonti, L.; Schweizer, S.; Stretton, J.; Knights, E.; Henson, R. N.; Cam-CAN, ; Wolpe, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundDepressed individuals show attentional biases in the processing of emotional stimuli, such as negative face expressions. Some of these biases persist in previously depressed individuals, but their mechanisms remain largely unknown. MethodsA population-derived cohort (n = 134, 68 females; 21 - 92 years) was recruited by Cam-CAN. Functional MRI was acquired during a gender discrimination task, which used angry and neutral faces. Drift diffusion modelling (DDM) was used to investigate the latent components of the decision process, focusing on the effect of emotional valence. DDM parameters were correlated with activity in brain regions. Results14% of participants reported a history of depression in remission. The best fitting DDM specified a different drift rate for angry and neutral faces. A slower drift rate for angry faces predicted depression in remission (OR 0.092, p = 0.048). This effect persisted after accounting for current depression symptoms and drift rate for neutral faces. Participants with a slower drift rate for angry faces demonstrated increased activations in the bilateral insula, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus and bilateral parietal cortex when viewing angry relative to neutral faces. ConclusionsOur results suggest a persistent attentional bias in the processing of angry faces in individuals with depression in remission, over and above their current depressive symptoms. The imaging findings suggest that the slowing is associated with changes in areas involved in emotional regulation and evidence accumulation. Attentional biases in the processing of emotional information may reflect a trait, rather than state, in individuals with depression.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 96%
- Neurocognitive measures of self-blame and risk prediction models of recurrence in major depressive disorder 96%
- Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Correlates of Positive and Negative Valence System Dysfunction in Adolescents Revealed by Data-Driven Parcellation and Resting-State Network Modeling 96%
- Novel polygenic risk score as a translational tool linking depression-related changes in the corticolimbic transcriptome with neural face processing and anhedonic symptoms 96%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 97%
- Distinct neurofunctional alterations during motivational and hedonic processing of natural and monetary rewards in depression – a neuroimaging meta-analysis 96%
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Recommendations for the study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor of Depression 95%
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 95%
- Brain-based predictions of psychiatric illness-linked behaviors across the sexes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ketamine and attentional bias to threat: dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic connectivity in treatment-resistant depression 95%
- Microstructural white matter and links with subcortical structures in chronic schizophrenia: A free-water imaging approach. 92%
- Functional Connectivity of the Cerebellar Vermis in Bipolar Disorder and Associations with Mood 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.