Back

Can a Simple Phenomenological Model Explain the Mechanics of Eccentric Contractions?

Yeo, S.-H.; Herzog, W.

2023-03-23 physiology
10.1101/2023.03.12.532315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Notwithstanding decades of research, predictions from the existing muscle models on eccentric contraction remain elusive. This study aimed to test the possibility that a relatively simple phenomenological muscle model, based on an adapted Hill-type muscle model with some novel assumptions, can capture the mechanics of eccentric contractions. The result of the simulations, although preliminary, support the potential of the proposed model in predicting the mechanics of eccentric contraction.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
● 40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
European Journal of Applied Physiology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
● 259 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
8
Gait & Posture
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
13
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Applied Physiology
● 32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Experimental Physiology
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Physiological Reports
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
The Journal of Physiology
○ 150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Medicine
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
29
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
● 37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.