Back

How long is the long COVID? a retrospective analysis of football players in two major European Championships.

Miccinilli, S.; Bravi, M.; Conti, G.; Bressi, F.; Sterzi, S.; Santacaterina, F.; Ciccozzi, M.

2023-03-14 sports medicine
10.1101/2023.03.11.23287138 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectivesthe goal of this study was to investigate the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection and muscle injuries among a large sample of professional soccer players. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on professional soccer players from the Serie A and LaLiga leagues during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 football seasons. The players were divided into two groups based on whether they contracted the Sars-CoV-2 infection (C+) or not (C-) during the 2020/2021 season. Data collection was conducted using the Transfermarkt24 site. ResultsIn the 2019-2020 both championships showed non-significant differences in the average number of muscular injuries between the C+ group and the C- group (Serie A: p=0.194; 95%CI: - 0.044 to 0.215, LaLiga p=0.915; 95%CI: -0.123 to 0.137). In the 2020-2021 the C+ group had a significantly higher number of muscular injuries compared to the C- group in both championships (Serie A: p<0.001; 95%CI 0.731 to 1.038; LaLiga: p<0.001; 95%CI: 0.773 to 1.054). Multiple linear regression analysis confirmed that belonging to C+ in the season 2020/2021 was the variable that most strongly influenced the probability of having a muscle injury in both championships. Survival analysis revealed a hazard ratio of 3.73 (95%CI 3.018 to 4.628) and of 5.14 (95% CI 3.200 to 8.254) for Serie A and LaLiga respectively. ConclusionsThis retrospective cohort study revealed a significant association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and increased risk of muscle injury, emphasizing the importance of carefully considering the infection in the decision-making process for determining athletes readiness to return to sport.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.