Back

Aberrant phase separation is a common killing strategy of positively charged peptides in biology and human disease

Boeynaems, S.; Ma, X. R.; Yeong, V.; Ginell, G. M.; Chen, J.-H.; Blum, J. A.; Nakayama, L.; Sanyal, A.; Briner, A.; Van Haver, D.; Pauwels, J.; Ekman, A.; Schmidt, H. B.; Sundararajan, K.; Porta, L.; Lasker, K.; Larabell, C.; Hayashi, M. A. F.; Kundaje, A.; Impens, F.; Obermeyer, A.; Holehouse, A. S.; Gitler, A. D.

2023-03-09 cell biology
10.1101/2023.03.09.531820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Positively charged repeat peptides are emerging as key players in neurodegenerative diseases. These peptides can perturb diverse cellular pathways but a unifying framework for how such promiscuous toxicity arises has remained elusive. We used mass-spectrometry-based proteomics to define the protein targets of these neurotoxic peptides and found that they all share similar sequence features that drive their aberrant condensation with these positively charged peptides. We trained a machine learning algorithm to detect such sequence features and unexpectedly discovered that this mode of toxicity is not limited to human repeat expansion disorders but has evolved countless times across the tree of life in the form of cationic antimicrobial and venom peptides. We demonstrate that an excess in positive charge is necessary and sufficient for this killer activity, which we name polycation poisoning. These findings reveal an ancient and conserved mechanism and inform ways to leverage its design rules for new generations of bioactive peptides.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 5%
26.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
8
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
9
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
12
Nature Chemistry
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
14
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
18
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.