Back

Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Overall Survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers.

Joseph, N.; Bamunuarachchci, V.; Peiris, V.; Wijesekera, S.; Rajapakse, D.; Gunasekera, S.

2023-03-10 oncology
10.1101/2023.03.09.23287082 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNovel systemic therapeutic options such as enzyme inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have transformed the practice of medical oncology in the recent past. However, survival gains remain modest in most cases. Quantifying the magnitude of benefit against financial and non-financial toxicity of treatment is pivotal in deciding treatment. We describe a novel metric which can be used to assess effectiveness novel therapeutics for incurable cancers. MethodsThe median overall survival was divided by the median duration of treatment to obtain the overall survival gain per treatment time which was the primary end-point of the study. This parameter was compared with the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESMO-MCBS) score. Spearmans rank correlation coefficient was used to test the association between the novel metric and the ESMO-MCBS scores. ResultsData were available for 30 drugs across 60 indications. The median overall survival per unit treatment time ranged from 0.68 (range 0.2-0.51). Only 18/60 indications had a ratio greater than 1 while 13/60 indications had a ratio less than 0.5. The median treatment duration was not mentioned in 11 indications and median progression free survival was substituted for the analysis. The ESMO-MCBS score was available for 49 of the indications. The Spearmans rank correlation coefficient was 0.44575 and showed a statistically significant association between survival gain per unit treatment time and the ESMO-MCBS score (p = 0.00133). ConclusionsAlong with other metrics, the ratio of survival gain over treatment duration is a useful parameter to assess effectiveness of novel therapeutics in the palliative setting.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.