Clinical performance of a chemiluminescence SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay in a cohort of healthcare workers, blood donors and COVID-19 patients.
Rangel, G. A.; Lopez, D.; Chavarria, A.; Mudarra, L.; Britton, G. B.; Villarreal, A. E.
Show abstract
IntroductionSerological detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has become an essential tool to test vaccine efficacy and epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19. There have been limited published studies documenting the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays within hispanic populations. Materials and methodsWe evaluated the diagnostic performance of a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLIA) on a set of 1,035 samples including pre-pandemic samples, healthcare workers (HCW), blood donors (BD) and COVID-19 positive confirmed by RT-PCR collected from April to December 2020. ResultsThrough a ROC curve the CLIA test had a high diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.9854 (CI95% 95.68-100), P <0.0001. The analysis yielded a cut-off point 0.1950, sensitivity of 98.4% (CI95% 95 91.54-99.9), and specificity of 93.8% (CI95% 79.8 - 98.9). The diagnostic performance was also evaluated comparing the results with those obtained using other diagnostic techniques. Substantial agreement with the lateral flow chromatography and RT-PCR tests was found, and a high level of agreement with ELISA, with %PPA of 91.3 (CI95% 84.0-95.5), % NPA of 97.7 (CI95% 96.3-98.6), % OPA of 97.7 (CI95% 96.3-98.6) and Cohens kappa value of 90.4 (CI95% 85.8-94.9). A logistic regression was used to determine which of the independent variables predicted reactivity to CLIA test. A higher age was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.043 (CI95% 1.022-1.065), while the presence of at least one chronic disease was associated with an OR of 5.649 (CI95% 3.089-10.329) greater likelihood of reactivity. ConclusionsCLIA test exhibited excellent performance making it a suitable test for seroprevalence surveillance at the community level.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen detection rapid diagnostic test among healthcare workers in elderly care 97%
- Performance estimation of two in-house ELISA assays for COVID-19 surveillance through the combined detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA, IgM, and IgG immunoglobulin isotypes 96%
- Development And Performance Evaluation of A Rapid In-House ELISA for Retrospective Serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 97%
- Clinical evaluation of an automated, rapid mariPOC ® antigen test in screening of symptomatics and asymptomatics for SARS-CoV-2 infections 96%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 96%
- Antibodies anti-SARS-CoV2 time-course in patients and vaccinated subjects: an evaluation of the harmonization of two different methods 95%
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals 97%
- Age significantly influences the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody assays 96%
- Performance evaluation of novel fluorescent-based lateral immune flow assay (LIFA) for rapid detection and quantitation of total anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD binding antibodies in infected individuals 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.