Back

Biodiversity shows unique responses to land-use change across regional biomes

Bevan, P. A.; Ferreira, G. B.; Ingram, D. J.; Rowcliffe, M.; Young, L.; Freeman, R.; Jones, K. E.

2023-03-10 ecology
10.1101/2023.03.08.531730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biogeography has a critical influence on how ecological communities respond to threats and how effective conservation interventions are designed. For example, the resilience of ecological communities is linked to environmental and climatic features, and the nature of threats impacting ecosystems also varies geographically. Understanding community-level threat responses may be most accurate at fine spatial scales, however collecting detailed ecological data at such a high resolution would be prohibitively resource intensive. In this study, we aim to find the spatial scale that could best capture variation in community-level threat responses whilst keeping data collection requirements feasible. Using a database of biodiversity records with extensive global coverage, we modelled species richness and total abundance (the responses) across land-use types (reflecting threats), considering three different spatial scales: biomes, biogeographical realms, and regional biomes (the interaction between realm and biome). We then modelled data from three highly sampled biomes separately to ask how responses to threat differ between regional biomes and taxonomic group. We found strong support for regional biomes in explaining variation in species richness and total abundance compared to biomes or realms alone. Our biome case studies demonstrate that there is a high variation in magnitude and direction of threat responses across both regional biomes and taxonomic group, but all groups in tropical forest showed a consistently negative response, whilst many taxon-regional biome groups showed no clear response to threat in temperate forest and tropical grassland. Our results suggest that the taxon-regional biome unit has potential as a reasonable spatial and ecological scale for understanding how ecological communities respond to threats and designing effective conservation interventions to bend the curve on biodiversity loss.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
7
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
26
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%