Short-term transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation increases pupil size but does not affect EEG alpha power: a replication
Lloyd, B.; Wurm, F.; de Kleijn, R.; Nieuwenhuis, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a promising brain stimulation method for the treatment of pharmaco-resistant epilepsy and depression. Its clinical efficacy is thought to depend on taVNS-induced activation of the locus coeruleus. However, unlike for invasive VNS, there is little evidence for an effect of taVNS on noradrenergic activity. ObjectiveWe attempted to replicate recently published findings by Sharon et al. (2021), showing that short bursts of taVNS transiently increased pupil size and decreased EEG alpha power, two correlates of central noradrenergic activity. MethodsFollowing the original study, we used a single-blind, sham-controlled, randomized cross-over design. We applied short-term (3.4 s) taVNS in healthy human volunteers (n=29), while collecting resting-state pupil-size and EEG data. To analyze the data, we used scripts provided by Sharon and colleagues. ResultsConsistent with Sharon et al. (2021), pupil dilation was significantly larger during taVNS than during sham stimulation (p = .009; Bayes factor supporting the difference = 7.45). However, we failed to replicate the effect of taVNS on EEG alpha power (p = .37); the data were four times more likely under the null hypothesis (BF10 = 0.28). ConclusionOur findings support the effectiveness of short-term taVNS in inducing transient pupil dilation, a correlate of phasic noradrenergic activity. However, we failed to replicate the recent finding by Sharon et al. (2021) that taVNS attenuates EEG alpha activity. Overall, this study highlights the need for continued research on the neural mechanisms underlying taVNS efficacy and its potential as a treatment option for pharmaco-resistant conditions. It also highlights the need for direct replications of influential taVNS studies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tonic and phasic transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation both evoke rapid and transient pupil dilation 98%
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans is associated with an auditory confound that can be effectively masked 97%
- Reduced Auditory Perception and Brain Response with Quiet TMS Coil 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A machine-learning algorithm correctly classifies cortical evoked potentials from both natural retinal stimulation and electrical stimulation of the optic nerve 94%
- Microneurography as a Minimally Invasive Method to Assess Target Engagement During Neuromodulation 94%
- Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 97%
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 95%
- Stimulus-induced narrow-band gamma oscillations in humans can be recorded using open-hardware low-cost EEG amplifier 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kilohertz Transcranial Magnetic Perturbation (kTMP): A New Non-invasive Method to Modulate Cortical Excitability 94%
- Increasing motor skill acquisition by driving theta-gamma coupling 94%
- Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 96%
- Evaluating phasic transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) with pupil dilation: the importance of stimulation intensity and sensory perception 95%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.