Evolution of flowering time through the asynchrony of pollen dispersal
Xu, K.
Show abstract
The evolution of flowering time is often attributed to variation of pollinator rates over time. This study proposes that flowering time can evolve through siring success variation among individuals caused by differential pollen dispersal timing (a result of flowering time variation itself). Quantitative genetic models show that earlier flowering evolves under low pollen removal rates, high pollen deposition rates, and a slow decline in the fertilization ability of removed pollen. Variations in pollen dispersal timing also select for a stable variance in flowering time, which is larger when pollen removal rates are either very low or high, pollen deposition rates are moderate, and the fertilization ability of removed pollen declines more rapidly. Also, a model on the coevolution of flower longevity and flowering time predicts that under constant pollination rates, non-random mating results in a weak correlation between late flowering and longer-lived flowers. This baseline finding suggests that the observed correlation between late flowering and shorter flowering duration in nature is influenced by other factors, such as declining pollination rates during late-stage flowering. I discuss the role of altered pollination rates under climate change during flowering time evolution and the importance of distinguishing between pollen removal and deposition rates.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of the mutation load on the genomic composition of hybrids between outcrossing and self-fertilizing species 95%
- Theoretical analyses for the evolution of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emission strategy 94%
- Dynamical BLUP modeling of mean reaction norm evolution, accommodating changing environments, overlapping generations, and multivariate data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.